Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I am naive. I thought there were limits... places folks wouldn't go. [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)58. We can and should object. We certainly should advocate doing the right thing.
But we should not use ourselves as an example of a nation that has done the right thing. Iraq was wrong and it shouldnt be portrayed as less than a horrific blunder.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am naive. I thought there were limits... places folks wouldn't go. [View all]
cthulu2016
Mar 2014
OP
The nub of the issue is evidenced in numerous threads on this site in the past 12 hours.
2banon
Mar 2014
#8
I reject that wholly...the claim is specific and the evidence for it should be as well
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2014
#10
The OP made a claim...if posts proving it are "numerous," then supporting it shouldn't too hard
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2014
#18
I'm not defending anything: I'm asking you to substantiate your argument
alcibiades_mystery
Mar 2014
#26
I have just experienced what the OP is talking about. I was just told here on DU that Bush/Cheney
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#43
If it's too time and labor sensitive for you, it's even more so for those of us who don't believe
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#22
There you are, right on time. Would you care to provide some links to the conversation
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#44
Amazing, isn't it? Even Colin Powell doubted the legality they were claiming.
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#101
Happy to see this. We've disagreed on another geopolitical matter, but in complete agreement with
2banon
Mar 2014
#9
President Obama is in a tough position, but that's no excuse. Russia is taking advantage of
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#15
It kind of puts us in the same position we are claiming Russia is in, doesn't it?
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#46
We can and should object. We certainly should advocate doing the right thing.
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#58
Yes, but without Iraq, does he beat Hillary in the primaries. That's the question.
dawg
Mar 2014
#39
One of the main reasons, certainly one of my main reasons for supporting him.
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#47
If there is one thing the Democratic Party is missing, it's political courage.
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#103
Well said. Anyone who defends the lead up to the Iraq War should be embarrassed
cui bono
Mar 2014
#35
That's right! No less than 100% pure anti-Americanism should be allowed!
ConservativeDemocrat
Mar 2014
#42
Before you send some farm kid off to die, make sure he's protecting the U.S.
ConservativeDemocrat
Mar 2014
#88
There are more Conservative Democrats than Very Liberal Democrats in the party
ConservativeDemocrat
Mar 2014
#100
Amazing, right? Like only anti-American types could make such a big deal out of the Iraq War.
cthulu2016
Mar 2014
#55
There is no constructive point to anything related to Benghazi, it's a full-on loser
BeyondGeography
Mar 2014
#68
I just had someone saying we shouldn't prosecute war criminals because impeaching Clinton
cui bono
Mar 2014
#66
Maybe first you could identify where any U.S. Administration has been tried for war crimes
BeyondGeography
Mar 2014
#69
Don't forget, Nixon let LBJ slide, if you want to play the war crimes game
BeyondGeography
Mar 2014
#83