General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The used car salesman strikes again [View all]cui bono
(19,926 posts)If Nixon had been prosecuted it would have sent a message about how the rule of law applies to everybody. A lot of the people who were around back then wouldn't have survived to help in the war crimes of BushCo.
If BushCo had been prosecuted it would have sent that same message and gotten a lot of criminals out of our govt and military and would have restored people's faith in our govt. As it is a lot of people have given up on it because what's the point? If they can lie us into a war, and this is common knowledge at this point, not a conspiracy theory, and get away with it then our govt IS above the law after all. Not at all what the founding fathers had in mind.
For anyone, you or the president, to minimize the war crime is to enable more of this in the future and to diminish our standing in the world community.
You can't possibly think the impeachment of Clinton is on any level the same as prosecuting BushCo for war crimes? Your comparisons are astounding. That again is minimizing the gravity of the situation. We are talking about war crimes. Not a blow job.
And while you're comparing apples to oranges... how many people died in the Crimea annexation? How many people, people, not just American troops, died in the Iraq War? How many people were tortured in the Crimea annexation? How many people were tortured in the Iraq War? Did the people of Crimea get to vote for the annexation? Did the people of Iraq get to vote for the Iraq War?
Minimizing it absolutely is justifying it. And calling the prosecutions "a revenge oriented exercise in futility" is enabling it. Do you think we should just toss out our entire judicial system then?