General Discussion

Jim__

(15,236 posts)

15. Wildstein claims to have spoken to Christie about this on Sept 11.

Sat Mar 29, 2014, 10:06 AM

Mar 2014

We don't know whether or not Kelly spoke with Christie about it. If both Kelly and Wildstein claim to have spoken to him about it, their stories may be more credible than his denial.

But, say, there is no compelling criminal case against Christie. Christie still appointed the people that he now denigrates as unreliable to positions with a lot of power. That alone should be sufficient to take away any mojo that Christie ever had. Cristie's most compelling defense is incompetence - not exactly a qualification to be president.

There is also the use of the Port Authority for the personal enrichment of another of Christie's appointees, Samson, and the false testimony of Baroni.

Christie may not be charged with a crime, but he's unquestionably splattered with mud of his appointees.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does Stepian, Wildstein or Kelly have ANY documented evidence against Christie? [View all] CTyankee Mar 2014 OP

And because that is a narrative that a certain type of person likes, it might work. Squinch Mar 2014 #1

You know nothing about the woman jehop61 Mar 2014 #2

You have missed my point which was that there are plenty of people who believe shit about CTyankee Mar 2014 #6

You have misread my meaning. There are people who will jump at the chance to believe Squinch Mar 2014 #16

They Will, But... Laxman Mar 2014 #19

Yes. And she was the one who was unlucky (or dumb) enough to allow her email to get out. Squinch Mar 2014 #22

If she was a "true believer" then I think you are right. Such people, men or women, CTyankee Mar 2014 #3

Her participation in the scheme in the first place doesn't say good things about her. Squinch Mar 2014 #17

I hope so, too. He's a helluva lot worse than she is. CTyankee Mar 2014 #28

'the committee' who is the committee? this is shitting in the jury pool spanone Mar 2014 #4

But what if there are NO incriminating notes, messages, etc? CTyankee Mar 2014 #9

if kelly & wildstein testify the order came from the christie, i suspect that could nail him. spanone Mar 2014 #11

But they can say what they want and it will be spun by Christie that they were just trying to save CTyankee Mar 2014 #13

well, if they lie under oath, they face jail time. i don't think you can spin the fed investigators spanone Mar 2014 #14

I don't think they'll lie. I fear they don't have the hard evidence they need... CTyankee Mar 2014 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #20

LOL! Spazito Mar 2014 #26

Snork! Squinch Mar 2014 #30

But then what would be their motive to act this way? CTyankee Mar 2014 #34

Christie has no mojo randr Mar 2014 #5

I agree with you on CC being a pathological liar but "that" is his mojo, right there. CTyankee Mar 2014 #10

It might appear that way... Avalux Mar 2014 #7

My question as well. We answer with "well, if he didn't know, he should have known, therefore CTyankee Mar 2014 #12

While I suspect Christie was careful enough to not put his name in an e-mail... Bjorn Against Mar 2014 #8

I agree. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #21

Wildstein claims to have spoken to Christie about this on Sept 11. Jim__ Mar 2014 #15

So far, it is the best thing we have against Christie. CTyankee Mar 2014 #35

How it plays in Iowa will be up to his opponents. Jim__ Mar 2014 #38

my husband said the same thing to me this morning... CTyankee Mar 2014 #39

This Is About So Much More.... Laxman Mar 2014 #18

I think the Leutenant Governor's conversation with the mayor of Hoboken Squinch Mar 2014 #24

Yeah, what the real investigators get out of her will be key... CTyankee Mar 2014 #33

It would be easier to hide information 20 years ago. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #23

ah, my point is that maybe Christie DIDN'T rely on electronic devices. CTyankee Mar 2014 #31

It is easier to slip up than to have all your ducks in a row. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #42

A rebuttal to that NJ legislator. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #25

Oh, she knew that and the rest of Kornacki's panel knew that. CTyankee Mar 2014 #32

His judgement has been tarnished.....all of his closest aids were fired or resigned....he will never Gin Mar 2014 #27

The question is what do you want the outcome to be? tularetom Mar 2014 #36

I want him politically "dead." But there's that recent poll that has him CTyankee Mar 2014 #37

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #41

Baroni told Stepian of the shut down as it was happening Botany Mar 2014 #40

Would YOU have done this leaving a trail pointing at you? rocktivity Mar 2014 #43

that is true, too. I wonder what the prosecutors will make of that... CTyankee Mar 2014 #44

Preemptive strike rufus dog Mar 2014 #45

Yes, I think that is exactly what they are trying to do. CTyankee Mar 2014 #46