Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does Stepian, Wildstein or Kelly have ANY documented evidence against Christie? [View all]LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)21. I agree.
In the age of computers and cell phones there is too much floating around to hide. Most people don't understand the intricacies of electronic communication. The key component is that when email is sent it starts out with 2 copies. The sender and the recipient. And if there is a conversation they likely will use the reply method keeping a more detailed trail. Even if it were to involve phone conversations without text the connections can be made when time stamps can be matched between the caller and person called.
All of the tracks can't be covered or deleted.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does Stepian, Wildstein or Kelly have ANY documented evidence against Christie? [View all]
CTyankee
Mar 2014
OP
And because that is a narrative that a certain type of person likes, it might work.
Squinch
Mar 2014
#1
You have missed my point which was that there are plenty of people who believe shit about
CTyankee
Mar 2014
#6
You have misread my meaning. There are people who will jump at the chance to believe
Squinch
Mar 2014
#16
Yes. And she was the one who was unlucky (or dumb) enough to allow her email to get out.
Squinch
Mar 2014
#22
If she was a "true believer" then I think you are right. Such people, men or women,
CTyankee
Mar 2014
#3
Her participation in the scheme in the first place doesn't say good things about her.
Squinch
Mar 2014
#17
if kelly & wildstein testify the order came from the christie, i suspect that could nail him.
spanone
Mar 2014
#11
But they can say what they want and it will be spun by Christie that they were just trying to save
CTyankee
Mar 2014
#13
well, if they lie under oath, they face jail time. i don't think you can spin the fed investigators
spanone
Mar 2014
#14
I don't think they'll lie. I fear they don't have the hard evidence they need...
CTyankee
Mar 2014
#29
I agree with you on CC being a pathological liar but "that" is his mojo, right there.
CTyankee
Mar 2014
#10
My question as well. We answer with "well, if he didn't know, he should have known, therefore
CTyankee
Mar 2014
#12
While I suspect Christie was careful enough to not put his name in an e-mail...
Bjorn Against
Mar 2014
#8