General Discussion

Spazito

(55,336 posts)

26. LOL!

Reply to Name removed (Reply #20)

Sat Mar 29, 2014, 09:35 AM

Mar 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does Stepian, Wildstein or Kelly have ANY documented evidence against Christie? [View all] CTyankee Mar 2014 OP

And because that is a narrative that a certain type of person likes, it might work. Squinch Mar 2014 #1

You know nothing about the woman jehop61 Mar 2014 #2

You have missed my point which was that there are plenty of people who believe shit about CTyankee Mar 2014 #6

You have misread my meaning. There are people who will jump at the chance to believe Squinch Mar 2014 #16

They Will, But... Laxman Mar 2014 #19

Yes. And she was the one who was unlucky (or dumb) enough to allow her email to get out. Squinch Mar 2014 #22

If she was a "true believer" then I think you are right. Such people, men or women, CTyankee Mar 2014 #3

Her participation in the scheme in the first place doesn't say good things about her. Squinch Mar 2014 #17

I hope so, too. He's a helluva lot worse than she is. CTyankee Mar 2014 #28

'the committee' who is the committee? this is shitting in the jury pool spanone Mar 2014 #4

But what if there are NO incriminating notes, messages, etc? CTyankee Mar 2014 #9

if kelly & wildstein testify the order came from the christie, i suspect that could nail him. spanone Mar 2014 #11

But they can say what they want and it will be spun by Christie that they were just trying to save CTyankee Mar 2014 #13

well, if they lie under oath, they face jail time. i don't think you can spin the fed investigators spanone Mar 2014 #14

I don't think they'll lie. I fear they don't have the hard evidence they need... CTyankee Mar 2014 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #20

LOL! Spazito Mar 2014 #26

Snork! Squinch Mar 2014 #30

But then what would be their motive to act this way? CTyankee Mar 2014 #34

Christie has no mojo randr Mar 2014 #5

I agree with you on CC being a pathological liar but "that" is his mojo, right there. CTyankee Mar 2014 #10

It might appear that way... Avalux Mar 2014 #7

My question as well. We answer with "well, if he didn't know, he should have known, therefore CTyankee Mar 2014 #12

While I suspect Christie was careful enough to not put his name in an e-mail... Bjorn Against Mar 2014 #8

I agree. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #21

Wildstein claims to have spoken to Christie about this on Sept 11. Jim__ Mar 2014 #15

So far, it is the best thing we have against Christie. CTyankee Mar 2014 #35

How it plays in Iowa will be up to his opponents. Jim__ Mar 2014 #38

my husband said the same thing to me this morning... CTyankee Mar 2014 #39

This Is About So Much More.... Laxman Mar 2014 #18

I think the Leutenant Governor's conversation with the mayor of Hoboken Squinch Mar 2014 #24

Yeah, what the real investigators get out of her will be key... CTyankee Mar 2014 #33

It would be easier to hide information 20 years ago. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #23

ah, my point is that maybe Christie DIDN'T rely on electronic devices. CTyankee Mar 2014 #31

It is easier to slip up than to have all your ducks in a row. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #42

A rebuttal to that NJ legislator. LiberalFighter Mar 2014 #25

Oh, she knew that and the rest of Kornacki's panel knew that. CTyankee Mar 2014 #32

His judgement has been tarnished.....all of his closest aids were fired or resigned....he will never Gin Mar 2014 #27

The question is what do you want the outcome to be? tularetom Mar 2014 #36

I want him politically "dead." But there's that recent poll that has him CTyankee Mar 2014 #37

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #41

Baroni told Stepian of the shut down as it was happening Botany Mar 2014 #40

Would YOU have done this leaving a trail pointing at you? rocktivity Mar 2014 #43

that is true, too. I wonder what the prosecutors will make of that... CTyankee Mar 2014 #44

Preemptive strike rufus dog Mar 2014 #45

Yes, I think that is exactly what they are trying to do. CTyankee Mar 2014 #46