Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does anyone here really think people bashing the president will vote for the GOP in 2014, 2016? [View all]JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)41. You seem to be looking for a serious answer? So ok.
I think some of them want the Dems to lose so that the Republicans can finish destroying the country. Then, after the associated collapse, a socialist Utopia will emerge from the ashes.
Let's go through it. I think this sentence in your post is very important.
Someone can be extremely disappointed in President Obama and the current Democratic leadership and still want progressive elected officials.
That sentence has two key parts. (1) Disappointment. (2) Progressive elected leaders.
On DU we see endless "disappointment" OPs. They absolutely dominate everything else. And hey, use the word FUCK in your OP title attacking the President and it will get 200+ recs. OPs that copy it style, same topic, same thing. Create an alternate personality so you can build strawmen to attack other DUers who support the President or Democrats, you're a hero. So DU has the "disappointment" element of that sentence totally covered.
So where are the OPs promoting these "Progressive Leaders" you mention? Good luck finding ANY. I mean, if that's what these folks really want, more progressive leaders, where are the OPs promoting these progressive candidates? There are none. I'd bet they are outnumbered by the angry disappointment OPs 100-1. DU doesn't seem nearly as interested in promoting "Progressive Candidates" as it is about airing its numerous "disappointments".
Honestly, I think the angry and disappointed folks are simply angry disappointed folks. I get the sense that they are always upset. Their outrage meter is pegged to 11 on every topic. Its as if DU is part of their anger management therapy. A release valve. At least I hope so. I'd hate to see them acting like this in public.
I'm curious, would you want to take any of these folks out to help with a GOTV effort? I can see it now ... you walk up to a house, knock, and start talking to some one ... "oh, you don't know about the ACA ... well, I'll tell you ... IT SUCKS!! ... Obama was a jerk for signing it, FUCK him, and your sell out congressman should have held out for single payer!! ... he's a corporate whore!! Ok now, remember, vote for Dems on Nov 6th."
... Or do we think these folks will be more positive in their GOTV approach outside DU? I have trouble believing that.
Back to the end of the world part ... towards the end you say ...
Some people just don't believe in the current Democratic status quo! That does not mean they support the GOP.
I agree that's how some might feel ... but they also might just want the Dems to lose the election and "learn a lesson" (I've seen that posted here many times), or they might stay home (they threaten to do this too) ... and some of them are quite honest that they won't vote for Hillary if she wins the nomination under any circumstance (which tells me its ok with them if a Republican gets in the white house).
I think some of them are so upset with what you call the status quo ... they hope for a collapse. Because afterwards (they think), the people will finally see the light and join them. So their path to seeing all those causes fully implemented, includes a disaster in which we initially lose ground on all of them.
As for how hard some of them worked for Obama ... no way to really know ... I do get the sense that some of them have a rather simplistic view of American politics. Obama was supposed to clean up 2 wars, stop a depression, end LGBT discrimination, get free health care, close the banks ... and then on his second day ... well ... the idea that Obama was going to fix problems that took 30+ years to create in under 5 years, is silly, but I get the sense some actually expected that, and they are pissed it hasn't happened.
Finally ... although I don't have much issue to take with your OP, I mean, it appears serious ... I do wonder where you saw a post on DU claiming the President was "perfect". I've never seen one.
I do see Obama supporters get accused of that here. Here's the reality. Not one of us thinks Obama is perfect. But when we agree with a particular criticism we never do so with sufficient vitriol for it to get noticed.
Perhaps if the "disappointed" folks didn't have their outrage meter pegged to 11 at all times, some one would notice that fact. You said this is a "damn discussion board" ... its tough to "discuss" anything seriously with people who are shouting at you all the time.
We now return DU to its regularly scheduled outrage.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
249 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Does anyone here really think people bashing the president will vote for the GOP in 2014, 2016? [View all]
Logical
Mar 2014
OP
Well, most of the things they complained about in2010 have been done. They can't get 100%
kelliekat44
Mar 2014
#199
One guy in this forum plainly said that he was not going to vote. That he'd stay home and eat French
Number23
Mar 2014
#175
Find it yourself. Then you can see all of the "context" and "profile" you want
Number23
Mar 2014
#182
I've already found it. Hence the citation. Not surprised that point seemed to escape you.
Number23
Mar 2014
#196
The last time you accused me of posting nonsense a considerable number of people informed
Number23
Mar 2014
#217
And there it is again, the false statement that Democrats stayed home. If Dems had stayed home in
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#115
I'm not contending anything, I am stating FACTS, facts drawn from the statistics on who stayed home
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#131
You really think this board is mostly about bashing democrats? And I would be 80% of the active....
Logical
Mar 2014
#4
I think some posters need to take a month break. I agree, a little (way) over the top. nt
Logical
Mar 2014
#9
Third party canddates ARE the enemy - that's the way the American electoral system is set up.
baldguy
Mar 2014
#84
If Sanders mounts a challenge in 2016 to the Democratic presidential nominee in the general election
baldguy
Mar 2014
#110
I do. He's taken donations from most Democratic PACS for much of his career, including HILLPAC.
MADem
Mar 2014
#228
Shhh!!! It's a secret! Don't forget your voter ID & a copy of your GOP RSVP invitation!
think
Mar 2014
#93
What I learned this week - I guess the next time I send in an alert and it gets struck down
Rex
Mar 2014
#202
I think they are more likely to stay home in November or for their state primary.
greatauntoftriplets
Mar 2014
#12
I don't think anyone complaining about Obama would cause me not to vote democratic. And I have not..
Logical
Mar 2014
#14
I agree with your opinion. The 'no use' attitude vote that 'all politicians are the same '
lumpy
Mar 2014
#240
You're welcome. When these red states start turning out 80-90% to vote for Republicans ....
Scuba
Mar 2014
#36
When the President is portrayed as a traitor to Democratic principles by betrayal it is damaging.
lumpy
Mar 2014
#242
It's not aimed at non-political voters, it aimed at those who are confused and think ...
Scuba
Mar 2014
#34
Since when has 'carping' achieved anything beyond ostracizing the ones doing it?
Number23
Mar 2014
#176
I know that, but it describes the behavior perfectly. Which you seemed to agree when you used the
Number23
Mar 2014
#180
DLCers don't realize that just as the GOP is counting on their base of those who remember Jim Crow
yurbud
Mar 2014
#40
Yes I do, because a non-voting Democrat is basically giving half a vote to a Republican
tarheelsunc
Mar 2014
#21
The self-described "moderates" have already proven that they are the ones who will sit it out.
Marr
Mar 2014
#38
any low Dem turnout will be solely the fault of Dem leaders, they need to encourage Dem..
politicman
Mar 2014
#209
I doubt the bashing is bringing in votes for the DNC members, why can't the effort used towards
Thinkingabout
Mar 2014
#42
Bashing Obama on DU will not get people to vote GOP or stay home, but stuff like this could
Autumn
Mar 2014
#47
If the main message people here is "the Democrats suck" ... Dems will stay home.
JoePhilly
Mar 2014
#67
If anything critical of the Presiden't policies is being halted or silenced in any way ...
JoePhilly
Mar 2014
#163
Meanwhile, on the West Coast, 2010 saw great turn out and massive Democratic victories.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#73
Thanks for the civil response. I suggest actually looking at why it is different here.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2014
#98
North Carolina Democrats outvoted Republicans in straight-party voting...
WorseBeforeBetter
Mar 2014
#224
I work in a professional office where about half the people vote on a regular basis.
FSogol
Mar 2014
#72
No, but some here have stated that if the nominee in 2016 doesn't meet their purity standards,
Beacool
Mar 2014
#82
Sitting out because you are huffy you didn't get what you wanted, is like voting for the GOP.
Whisp
Mar 2014
#86
There are Libertarian talking points on DU from time to time…points not in the Democratic Party...
Tikki
Mar 2014
#111
I've been trying to recall how many times this question has been asked on DU over the years.
Solly Mack
Mar 2014
#138
probably not vote GOP, but it seems for some to is a mission to make as many other DUers as pissed
dionysus
Mar 2014
#158
Do I think they'll vote for the GOP? Yes, either directly or INDIRECTLY by voting for
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#165
Some will vote for 3rd party candidates, allowing the Rethugs to divide and conquer.
pnwmom
Mar 2014
#187
That would require logic and not knee-jerk responses from the "You're anti-Obama" brigade...
truebrit71
Mar 2014
#208
It's the same way I have to explain it to my "fiscally conservative, socially liberal" friends...
Hippo_Tron
Mar 2014
#212