Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
17. I know and i agree. We should speak up.
Sat Mar 29, 2014, 12:32 PM
Mar 2014

But not in a way where we dig our own graves.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We would talk about war with Syria and Russia /nt jakeXT Mar 2014 #1
I think we would have already been at war. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #2
None of it is constructive criticism treestar Mar 2014 #3
I am a scumbag because I criticize policy; YOU claim that is President bashing. antiquie Mar 2014 #5
I'm reminded of the French monarch who, when told the people were not criticizing him but rather Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2014 #11
Most of it is not constructive criticism of any policy treestar Mar 2014 #21
Just when and where did I even say he was a bad president? antiquie Mar 2014 #27
I am not driving anyone away treestar Mar 2014 #36
Until your last couple of posts you were addressing me. antiquie Mar 2014 #40
It's so easy to offend! treestar Mar 2014 #49
Lol! That is truly funny Katashi_itto Mar 2014 #58
That's just false. treestar Mar 2014 #61
they *want* to drive people away. It is a minority who want the forums newthinking Mar 2014 #77
If I sincerely believe that he could have fought harder and didn't then saying totodeinhere Mar 2014 #72
I've never seen you acknowledge any criticism of Obama as legitmate. Marr Mar 2014 #140
You're assuming there has to be criticism that is legitimate treestar Mar 2014 #150
Of course you don't have to agree with every criticism. Marr Mar 2014 #154
I haven't seen a lot of good ones for the DU dust ups treestar Mar 2014 #155
Really? treestar Mar 2014 #20
Your language is completely unacceptable to me. antiquie Mar 2014 #30
You can't claim to be better with that language about The Great One treestar Mar 2014 #38
You're not driving any one off. antiquie Mar 2014 #47
Yes, I do treestar Mar 2014 #60
You are right Caretha Mar 2014 #130
Don't you dare leave! In_The_Wind Mar 2014 #23
+10000 G_j Mar 2014 #25
What is being criticized is the manner in which is done. No probem in criticizing but calling Obama lumpy Mar 2014 #52
They know that.... Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #114
Says who? Caretha Mar 2014 #136
I was under the impression that only ReThugs referred to the H in Obama'a name. Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #57
Didn't catch that. treestar Mar 2014 #62
Not necessarily. The official Barack Obama biography at the White House website refers to him as totodeinhere Mar 2014 #75
Of course they use the H...it's his official name. Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #102
Bingo. BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #143
Oh please! That is so stupid! rusty fender Mar 2014 #147
I picked that up too. rufus dog Mar 2014 #119
I agree, Treestar. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #6
I know, you'd think there were no repukes dark angel treestar Mar 2014 #22
Anyone who hangs Caretha Mar 2014 #139
They They They They.. G_j Mar 2014 #32
I doubt you are innocent of that treestar Mar 2014 #44
frankly, G_j Mar 2014 #73
You know what would help? cui bono Mar 2014 #54
Whatever leaves the impression that Obama is personally disliked or hated by Democrats is lumpy Mar 2014 #78
Impressions are in the eye of the beholder. cui bono Mar 2014 #88
+1 LittleBlue Mar 2014 #112
There is some of that at DU. But to say that "none" of it is constructive is quite a stretch. totodeinhere Mar 2014 #67
I have seen very little constructive criticism of Obama on this site. Most response has been drawn lumpy Mar 2014 #87
Expressing disappointment at the POTUS's actions or words is constructive criticism. Gormy Cuss Mar 2014 #79
Judging by some posts these days on DU BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #4
+1 n/t FSogol Mar 2014 #7
Well, if we had McCain or Romney as president at least we'd be united in our misery and outrage. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2014 #13
You know, sometimes I think there are some who are happiest when they"re the party in opposition. nt Fla Dem Mar 2014 #68
and, that would be the very Least of OUR concerns. Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2014 #152
They hate him more than they hated Bush! treestar Mar 2014 #24
Exactly, treestar. BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #65
Yes, it's not human nature to turn on something you worked hard for treestar Mar 2014 #148
Most of those naysayers here are Libertarians or Liberaltarians BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #157
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #141
+1 JustAnotherGen Mar 2014 #55
Watching some of these folks Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #59
Oh, we *know* why they're here. BlueCaliDem Mar 2014 #82
+1 redqueen Mar 2014 #103
There's a big difference between bashing from the right and calling out from the left. Scuba Mar 2014 #8
There is no purity test involved. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #9
Not offended, but I cringe when I see folks trying to pull us left equated with right-wing bashers. Scuba Mar 2014 #10
We dont have to be vile when we criticise. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #12
I hope I'm never "vile", but you must realize there's a huge amount of frustration with .... Scuba Mar 2014 #14
I know and i agree. We should speak up. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #17
Congratulations Scuba and darkanglel 218 Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #92
Well said, darkangel.. "But not in a way where we dig our own graves." Cha Mar 2014 #113
I just don't feel betrayed by all that treestar Mar 2014 #26
That's the saddest post I've ever read. Scuba Mar 2014 #28
To me it's sad when someone says they feel betrayed treestar Mar 2014 #41
You got that right BrotherIvan Mar 2014 #43
How am I going to keep track of each appointment and act of the Presidency? treestar Mar 2014 #48
So keeping neocons and Bush appointees in place BrotherIvan Mar 2014 #51
Has that been the case for every single office? treestar Mar 2014 #63
It a cop out to say you just can't keep track of stuff mindwalker_i Mar 2014 #69
If you admittedly don't have the time to keep track of every appointment cui bono Mar 2014 #80
I agree. Sad and almost pathetic. grasswire Mar 2014 #101
"I don't care who gets appointed" cui bono Mar 2014 #74
Yes, I appreciate that you don't take the vile insulting crap road. And, I'm sure you realize Cha Mar 2014 #115
Sadly, my reading is different. While he's done some good things the good is overwhelmed ... Scuba Mar 2014 #116
I think you're way off but that's your opinion.. my is the opposite so we will just have to Cha Mar 2014 #117
What grade would you give him on handling the banks? Monsanto? How heavily do you weigh .... Scuba Mar 2014 #118
Bullshit on your measley attempt to smear President Obama with the kochs. Cha Mar 2014 #120
How about the Keystone Pipeline. Will the President approve it? Who stands to gain from it? Scuba Mar 2014 #121
Well said Cha! sheshe2 Mar 2014 #142
Mahalo, she.. Yeah, it doesn't matter what Obama has done or Cha Mar 2014 #144
You hit the nail in one sentence. Thanks lumpy Mar 2014 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author Trajan Mar 2014 #106
It's the CT-tool-of-the-MIC-America-is-the-bane-of-humanity fare that brings that out BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #37
I agree, I don't think posters should not be equated with right wing bashers, or similar responses. lumpy Mar 2014 #66
But, the president isn't running -this- year. HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #15
he also said that the most important thing right now BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #29
So, dem candidates should provide things that attract voters to them. HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #35
to the nonpolitical it will encourage them to not bother voting treestar Mar 2014 #42
There are a lot of nonpoliticals aroung here, aren't there? HereSince1628 Mar 2014 #56
in all honesty.... grasswire Mar 2014 #104
United we stand, divided we fall. NCTraveler Mar 2014 #16
much better chance of that happening if we get more Dems BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #33
I agree. Time for the pro-war, pro-insurance, pro-drilling, pro-TPP, pro-KXL, pro-chained CPI, Doctor_J Mar 2014 #158
Thanks, Dark Angel WhiteTara Mar 2014 #18
Attribution correction! It's Ben Franklin WhiteTara Mar 2014 #84
+1 million darkangel218 Mar 2014 #90
I agree but being United is a two way street Babel_17 Mar 2014 #19
K&R for a well-worded appeal to reason BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #31
a a "hideous hermaphroditical character.." Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #34
Just because vile sniping was used in the past doesn't mean it should continue to be the standard. lumpy Mar 2014 #94
Get back to me after the next presidential campaign. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #95
I wont get back to you most likely. Sure, the Repubs will get shit on, but it will relieve the shit lumpy Mar 2014 #100
We're going to fall tabasco Mar 2014 #39
This is the second OP with the same message? BrotherIvan Mar 2014 #45
You came forth with a lovely example of what we have been talking about. lumpy Mar 2014 #96
some people seem to get off on the attention from POTUS-bashing around here stg81 Mar 2014 #46
LOL! HangOnKids Mar 2014 #131
It's official, DU has turned into Jr High.... :-/ n/t DeSwiss Mar 2014 #50
It's okay to follow your principles and speak your mind, always. whatchamacallit Mar 2014 #53
Yes we should all strive to keep our tempers in check and remain civil. But that totodeinhere Mar 2014 #64
I agree, toto. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #76
I'm a regular poster on Israel Conflict Board Baconeater Mar 2014 #70
Wha? "Because Yahoo comments" is an argument now? cthulu2016 Mar 2014 #71
Desperate people say desperate things. Rex Mar 2014 #83
I dont belong to any "crews". darkangel218 Mar 2014 #85
Yeah right you just got out of timeout and started right in on meta. Rex Mar 2014 #86
The attacks towards POTUS were technically Meta as well. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #93
...not sure that word means what you think it does. nt Union Scribe Mar 2014 #97
Whatever. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #98
Discussion of politics is technically Meta? cthulu2016 Mar 2014 #99
Yep. GoCubsGo Mar 2014 #81
My signature line says it all. SmittynMo Mar 2014 #89
I saw criticism, not bashing. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #105
So, anyone who criticizes this Democratic President Trajan Mar 2014 #107
"Anyone" "MUST" Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #108
Useless Trajan Mar 2014 #110
Useless Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #111
Most of the Fan Club have broken with reality Doctor_J Mar 2014 #126
LOL ... forgot about you. 1000words Mar 2014 #109
it is your duty as a citizen to think critically noiretextatique Mar 2014 #122
how is Alaska? Kali Mar 2014 #123
I dont know, you tell me. darkangel218 Mar 2014 #124
you didn't get your degree in January and move to Alaska Kali Mar 2014 #125
i think she may have not passed a portion of the boards CreekDog Mar 2014 #127
I never said i moved. I said i was considering. darkangel218 Apr 2014 #162
I agree, there are so many things on the rightwing to criticise, I have no idea why people... DrewFlorida Mar 2014 #128
You basically just unwittingly defended DU's Obama critics Maven Mar 2014 #129
Jackpot! HangOnKids Mar 2014 #132
Thankee Maven Mar 2014 #161
So criticism of our guy amounts to support for the opposition. TroglodyteScholar Mar 2014 #133
In a nutshell HangOnKids Mar 2014 #134
Welcome back darkangel! hrmjustin Mar 2014 #135
Thanks Justin! darkangel218 Mar 2014 #137
. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #138
Threads like this keep the flame alive. If you really want to get even, and apparently that's rhett o rick Mar 2014 #145
Until he repeals Race to the Top and Common Core I will criticize him all I want. liberal_at_heart Mar 2014 #146
This is BS. I have read Wills posts and still will vote for a Dem in 2014, 2016. People..... Logical Mar 2014 #149
Every fucking DUer will vote straight D this year, and 16, and 18, and so on, until they die Doctor_J Mar 2014 #159
Great point. nt Logical Mar 2014 #160
If you don't agree with me then you must be a member of the tea party! L0oniX Mar 2014 #151
If you don't agree with me then you must Bobbie Jo Mar 2014 #153
Regarding united we stand. chknltl Mar 2014 #156
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For anyone who thinks its...»Reply #17