Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
36. Subterfuge wrong on principle and bad practice.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:12 AM
Mar 2014

bemildred, I cannot agree with your statement, "If it resulted in good governance in Ukraine, I'd be fine with a bit of subterfuge." at all.

On many levels:

- The U.S.G. should not be the judge of what constitutes "good governance" in Ukraine. (Is your use of governance witting?)

- The U.S.G. has no business covertly undermining democratically elected governments. No argument based on the supposed ends can make that right.

- State-backed subterfuge to undermine foreign governments is hostile covert action, by definition. It makes enemies. They retaliate.

- Those holding office in U.S.G. have no business deciding on secret policy, especially not covert war on foreign entities, without going through this country's republican/democratic institutions. (That's what happened in this case: no public, no debate. Who decided what "our" policy to Ukraine should be? No one in the open, not even in an elite process.)

- Engaging in these practices generally means giving up a large part of sovereignty to an unaccountable deep state and parapolitical actors.

- The apparatus required to do such action effectively worldwide is enormous and creates a top-secret Frankenstein branch (or realm of many covert branches) of government, which is a permanent deep bureaucracy with many parapolitical tentacles, and largely in charge.

- In the big picture, you may like the results of one or another action but the end result, especially for the world's Mr. Big, is that everyone will consider him an enemy. It's a self-destructive policy as far as the people are concerned.

So to me, that it didn't have "good results" in Ukraine is not due to incompetence or mistakes or picking the wrong side. It's a predictable fallout of a nuts foreign policy system run as a self-service store for a tangle of elite geostrategists, corporations, spook groups and the super rich. The system will produce or contribute to such destabilizations constantly, keep the U.S. permanently entangled in machinations everywhere, and create the pretext for a trillion dollars spent on "security" and "defense" by the federal govt every year.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wish I had the ability to make a poll of this... JackRiddler Mar 2014 #1
It Is Good To See Your Caveats, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #2
Normal practice is not therefore good. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #4
It absolutely was our business to conduct in the first place. That's the business of every country stevenleser Mar 2014 #5
So "business" is subterfuge and you approve. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #8
Ooh, you used a big scary sounding word that sounds bad! No. Read again what I wrote. nt stevenleser Mar 2014 #11
Really? Subterfuge is a big word to you? JackRiddler Mar 2014 #12
As The Man Said, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #6
Unacceptable. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #9
You May Forgive Me, Sir, For Being Unable To Take Your Line Seriously Any Longer Here The Magistrate Mar 2014 #13
The answer, actually... JackRiddler Mar 2014 #14
My perception of the situation would disagree with you tech3149 Mar 2014 #27
What you seem to not understand, Sir, is a knowledgeable and thoughtful AngryAmish Mar 2014 #34
Should you not have beat your wife? nt Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2014 #3
It was not a coup. joshcryer Mar 2014 #7
So they held a constitutional impeachment, did they? JackRiddler Mar 2014 #10
Yes, the impeachment was legal. joshcryer Mar 2014 #16
I'm sure they are moderate. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #18
The key will be handling the oligarchs. joshcryer Mar 2014 #19
Yeah, they've got the perfect government JackRiddler Mar 2014 #20
They well have elections. joshcryer Mar 2014 #22
bumping JackRiddler Mar 2014 #15
The USA needs to stay out of Ukranie and Russia's business bigwillq Mar 2014 #17
Way too many folks are ignoring this simple set of facts malaise Mar 2014 #21
Yeah but the corporate media... JackRiddler Mar 2014 #24
M$M never fails malaise Mar 2014 #25
Don't think they don't know what they are doing JVS Mar 2014 #28
Some of them do... JackRiddler Mar 2014 #29
I think this is what's most frustrating ozone_man Mar 2014 #23
It's about the gold reserves Forever29 Mar 2014 #26
Geostrategy is a lot more than gold. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #30
Thank you for stating so well what many of us here felt at the time and still KoKo Mar 2014 #31
I think the point is that they made a mess of it. nt bemildred Mar 2014 #32
Would it have been okay if it had been effective? JackRiddler Mar 2014 #33
If it resulted in good governance in Ukraine, I'd be fine with a bit of subterfuge. bemildred Mar 2014 #35
Subterfuge wrong on principle and bad practice. JackRiddler Mar 2014 #36
Oddly enough, having read all that, I don't find anything I particularly disagree with. bemildred Mar 2014 #37
It was not a coup. Spider Jerusalem Mar 2014 #38
In eastern Ukraine the popular seems to go the other way. JackRiddler Apr 2014 #39
Since it's kickable... JackRiddler Jun 2016 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the U.S. have supp...»Reply #36