Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
16. In our state and in most...charters only keep those who do well.
Sun Mar 30, 2014, 09:36 AM
Mar 2014
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/8250

One school in this system of charter schools sent over 12% of its 2009-2010 class back to the public school district. Two others dismissed 5% and 7% of their student enrollment.

So there you have it...one set of schools getting taxpayer money gets to pick and choose their students, the traditional public schools don't get that luxury. If schools get public money, they should keep the students and work with them.

And so they get puff articles written about how very good they are, with not a mention of how they keep such high scores. The local school board has no control over them, even as their success rewards them by letting them take even more money from these public schools.


http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/6757

School Board member Frank O’Reilly wants district official to start tracking how many students are transferred from charter schools to public schools as a result of their grades, social economic status or behavioral issues. During a work session this morning, O’Reilly read a letter sent by Harold Maready, superintendent of McKeel charter schools, to a parent about their third grader who flunked the FCAT.

“Your child does not meet the criteria to be a McKeel student,” O’Reilly read.

If public schools were to reject students based on their academic performance, then they could be A schools, too, O’Reilly said.

“We must take every child that comes through that door whether we like it or not,” O’Reilly said. ‘‘That is a public school paid by taxpayers’ dollars, and I like to remind Mr. Maready of that.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

In Indiana, the law is that the public districts must BlueStreak Mar 2014 #1
Public buildings given to private groups for free. madfloridian Mar 2014 #2
It's theft of the people's money. Giving away our tax dollars to Corporations, Defense Contractors, sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #20
..... madfloridian Mar 2014 #21
Some states overusing "underutilized"....skewing the numbers. madfloridian Mar 2014 #3
Well, it is a self-fulfilling prophesy BlueStreak Mar 2014 #6
True. madfloridian Mar 2014 #7
The problem is the flexibility of "underutilized" Recursion Mar 2014 #10
Let's understand what the game is. Nothing "works well" about any of this BlueStreak Mar 2014 #12
I can only speak for DC, which uses charters for something like 40% of its kids Recursion Mar 2014 #13
In our state and in most...charters only keep those who do well. madfloridian Mar 2014 #16
Are you sure about that? That seems 180 degrees off from what I hear everywhere else BlueStreak Mar 2014 #17
Being a neighborhood school with districts is NOT cherry-picking. madfloridian Mar 2014 #18
Of course it is. Only half the seats are reserved for neighborhood kids Recursion Mar 2014 #19
You must be talking about a certain area unlike most others. madfloridian Mar 2014 #22
k&r Starry Messenger Mar 2014 #4
Hey, thanks I missed that. madfloridian Mar 2014 #5
I know what. madfloridian Mar 2014 #8
It's not going away. Enthusiast Mar 2014 #11
Privatized education: The long awaited salvation for those poor waifs Jake Stern Mar 2014 #9
That describes the sensation pretty well.... madfloridian Mar 2014 #14
du rec. xchrom Mar 2014 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NY legislature: Charter s...»Reply #16