Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should Obamacare be repealed because it's a step in the wrong direction? [View all]Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)40. Of course it is realistic, many countries have already done it
Now it may well be the case that our bought and paid for politicians won't vote for it, but polls consistently show that the public supports single payer so it is the people who say it is not realistic who are out of touch.
Your suggestion that all funding and benefits would disappear are false, I clearly said the only way I would support repeal would be if single payer were implemented at the same time. That means the funding and benefits would not disappear they would just be implemented under the new single payer system.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Should Obamacare be repealed because it's a step in the wrong direction? [View all]
ProSense
Mar 2014
OP
I did, and no one is making that claim. You said it "implies" that. No, it doesn't.
ProSense
Mar 2014
#29
A person may believe that it is a step in the wrong direction, but not want to see it repealed,
bornskeptic
Mar 2014
#50
the point is, people are misunderstanding your point on account of your wordings,
Voice for Peace
Mar 2014
#53
It's not the wording of the post, it is the way you respond to those who misunderstand.
Voice for Peace
Mar 2014
#83
No, "dumb ass" may apply to the claim that the law was "a step in the wrong direction."
ProSense
Mar 2014
#8
Well, obviously anyone who thinks it was a step in the wrong direction...
Spider Jerusalem
Mar 2014
#19
"Many countries" have repealed the law in order to allow the U.S. Congress to pass single payer?
ProSense
Mar 2014
#41
Of course not. I think it is fair to say that would be going way too far
Douglas Carpenter
Mar 2014
#27
Either you are 100% happy with the current law and want it forever preserved, or you aren't
NoOneMan
Mar 2014
#71
So why didn't you have a third choice of Improving it, because its flypaper.
bahrbearian
Mar 2014
#75
Did someone suggest that it should? Or is this just a gratuitous STRAWMAN?
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#46
I cant tell if you are serious or joking. I support the ACA but this thread
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#59
"Either we are all supposed to love every period and comma in the piece of shit
ProSense
Mar 2014
#93
I think once ACA has been in place a few years, and risks are known, it will be much easier to pass
Hoyt
Mar 2014
#56
A reform should be passed to leave it null, void, and virtually dead in every sense
NoOneMan
Mar 2014
#61
"There are ways to achieve true egalitarian, universal health care in the US without repealing it"
brooklynite
Mar 2014
#81
Obamacare is the first attempt at the first program to cover all. This first attempt might not be
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#62
Yup. They never offered an alternative. They still aren't. They're simply whining nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#90
Yes! it's MUCH better to have nothing if we can't have something perfect...
brooklynite
Mar 2014
#80