Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Imagine what we could have accomplished with full control of Senate/House [View all]Demo_Chris
(6,234 posts)3. Obama was elected with a majority in the House and a super in the Senate...
They didn't even TRY to do anything with it. The dialog was exactly what we hear today. It was, "Yeah, sorry, still not enough. All we can do is whatever UnitedHealth and Goldman and Exxon and Monsanto and Lockheed tell us. Maybe if you give us just s few more seats we'll try to do some of the things we promised, but until then we can only do the opposite."
And when 2010 rolled around and the moderate and liberal voters they had just fucked over stayed home, their excuse was to blame voter apathy on so-called purists. The same thing they are doing today. I am a purist in this sense: if you want MY vote earn it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Imagine what we could have accomplished with full control of Senate/House [View all]
srican69
Mar 2014
OP
There other economic issues that incoming President Obama had to confront and he handled it!
kelliekat44
Mar 2014
#31
You were never going to "ram through" gun control reform...no matter what. What planet do you folks
kelliekat44
Mar 2014
#32
Gee, I live on the planet where a majority of Americans support gun control
SomethingFishy
Apr 2014
#50
That should have been plenty of time and the fact that they are not in session so often is part of
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2014
#27
The reason government takes time is because of the checks and balances of the two parties.
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2014
#29
whatever. Republicans have done plenty of damage when they have the majority.
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2014
#36
There might have been 70 days in between Franken's seating and Teddy's death.
PeteSelman
Mar 2014
#40