Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

they're just now saying this? Skittles Mar 2012 #1
And remember, it's all a distraction. Unless it involves the events of that night nothing else matte FarLeftFist Mar 2012 #23
oh I hear you Skittles Mar 2012 #30
And thanks to the complete bungling of the investigation we will never know if....... yourout Mar 2012 #2
They weren't found where he was shot. Kurska Mar 2012 #5
Oops....my bad. yourout Mar 2012 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Burch Mar 2012 #101
He* my bad typo. Kurska Mar 2012 #102
Deleted post you were responding to. Ken Burch Mar 2012 #111
As would I never do the same to you. Kurska Mar 2012 #116
Tomorrow they'll have him bombing Pearl Harbor and taking the Lindbergh baby. n/t EFerrari Mar 2012 #3
It is your position that this is fake? n/t Kurska Mar 2012 #12
Sure, why not. EFerrari Mar 2012 #15
Even if it isn't...it's irrelevant Ken Burch Mar 2012 #54
It might be relevant to a defense attorney trying to paint Trayvon in a negative light. Kurska Mar 2012 #90
You're forgetting the fact that Zimmerman wouldn't have know of this Ken Burch Mar 2012 #94
Not what the defense lawyer would imply. Kurska Mar 2012 #100
That assumes though, that Trayvon would be reckless enough Ken Burch Mar 2012 #104
I'd say the likelihood Trayvon acted like a paranoid criminal is increased if he is a criminal. Kurska Mar 2012 #118
But he had no record of theft whatsoever while EFerrari Mar 2012 #117
Check your pm's n/t. Ken Burch Mar 2012 #119
Zimmerman's assault charge was dropped I believe? Kurska Mar 2012 #121
Wrong. Zimmerman was charged with assault and on more than one occasion. EFerrari Mar 2012 #136
None Of It was Identified As Stolen, Ma'am, and The Officer Who Took It seems Still to Have It.... The Magistrate Mar 2012 #14
I don't know, your Honor. A black kid with a screwdriver? EFerrari Mar 2012 #20
And Yet You Can Buy Them Over The Counter At Any Hardware Store, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2012 #28
Sorry about the spray paint. EFerrari Mar 2012 #36
I Can Buy It Anywhere, Ma'am, I Am An Old Man The Magistrate Mar 2012 #39
Yes, they locked it up in a lot of places when Nick turned 15. EFerrari Mar 2012 #62
"They'll pry my screwdriver out of my cold, dead hands".... Ken Burch Mar 2012 #88
They couldn't prove it was stolen. I don't know if it was stolen. Kurska Mar 2012 #21
Straight Out Of The Article, Sir: Nothing Traced As Stolen The Magistrate Mar 2012 #26
Who do they return it to? Trayvon claimed he got it from a friend he refused to name. Kurska Mar 2012 #31
They Take It from You, Sir, They Give It Back To You The Magistrate Mar 2012 #37
As far as I know, the police can't return an item to someone who does not claim ownership of it. Kurska Mar 2012 #41
It was In His Possession, Sir, And They Have No Reason To Say It Was Unlawfully So The Magistrate Mar 2012 #47
Regardless of possession, it is my understanding he did not claim ownership of said item. Kurska Mar 2012 #48
This Is Not a Car, Sir, With Title And Blue Book Value The Magistrate Mar 2012 #68
Not trinkets, jewelry apparently containing diamonds and silver. Kurska Mar 2012 #74
Trinkets, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #80
Actually if you're a cop you return it to the person who owns it. Kurska Mar 2012 #83
Since Trayvon didn't CLAIM ownership, it means nothing that the jewels weren't returned to him Ken Burch Mar 2012 #99
I believe I explained my reasoning up thread why this is important. Kurska Mar 2012 #106
I have a feeling we are going to find out the origin of those objects. dkf Mar 2012 #95
I hope so. Kurska Mar 2012 #122
Yes. It will all come out especially after all this scrutiny. dkf Mar 2012 #126
If the police didn't charge Trayvon, that makes a pretty strong case Ken Burch Mar 2012 #60
I don't think anyone is claiming they were returned. Kurska Mar 2012 #71
I realize I misread that part. Will delete that portion of the post. Ken Burch Mar 2012 #86
When I was 9 or 10 years old, I bought a lady's wedding ring at a flea market Art_from_Ark Mar 2012 #40
Did they have diamonds in them? Were they silver wedding bands? Kurska Mar 2012 #49
'Silver Wedding Bands' Is Pretty Silly, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #56
You seem to be assuming things outside of the our possible knowledge. Kurska Mar 2012 #75
It was My Trade For a Number Of Years, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #79
The article doesn't claim the stones were set in silver. Kurska Mar 2012 #87
Again. it's irrelevant Ken Burch Mar 2012 #97
And In English, Sir, That Means All Items Were Silver The Magistrate Mar 2012 #105
I responded to this down thread, please look at it. Kurska Mar 2012 #130
Assuming there were any real stones involved. Ken Burch Mar 2012 #64
It was a 10K gold wedding band Art_from_Ark Mar 2012 #69
The Cited Article Says 'Silver Wedding Bands', Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #73
I sold the ring for the gold content Art_from_Ark Mar 2012 #92
Understood, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #110
I understand Art_from_Ark Mar 2012 #124
In any case, it doesn't matter. Ken Burch Mar 2012 #57
I think this poor kid was being profiled long before he crossed paths with Zimmerman. The Backlash Cometh Mar 2012 #33
Of course he was. He was a black teenager. EFerrari Mar 2012 #45
Trayvon was the second gunman on the grassy knoll! Incitatus Mar 2012 #19
So I guess Clinton is off the hook for those offenses. murielm99 Mar 2012 #42
And he'll be the second shooter on the Grassy Knoll. Ken Burch Mar 2012 #53
And don't forget about Albus Dumbledore and Jon Benet Ramsay n/t eridani Mar 2012 #109
AND he and Billie Jo were throwing something off the Talahatchie Bridge... Ken Burch Mar 2012 #112
"Well, this should be interesting. Nothing he previously had done would justify being shot" marmar Mar 2012 #4
Woah, I messed up that phrasing badly let me fix it. Kurska Mar 2012 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author marmar Mar 2012 #9
Again, why are you dwelling on a completely irrelevant detail? Ken Burch Mar 2012 #70
They are going to have a field day with his twitter account krawhitham Mar 2012 #7
Yeah, and he posted a shirtless pic with a beanie and making a gang gesture. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #10
Or...rather, somebody posted a picture of somebody else doing that... Ken Burch Mar 2012 #91
How many times are you going to post this "scoop"? Ecumenist Mar 2012 #11
I posted it once in latest breaking news. Kurska Mar 2012 #17
there WAS a murder Skittles Mar 2012 #128
irrelevant. spanone Mar 2012 #13
So it implies that if you get followed, you have to put up with it no matter if applegrove Mar 2012 #16
I guess the PR offensive is now well underway to ghettoize Martin bluestateguy Mar 2012 #18
+1000 That's exactly why they are delaying an arrest. EmeraldCityGrl Mar 2012 #34
None of that is relevant slackmaster Mar 2012 #22
According of course, to unamed pd sources nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #24
I bet you Junkdrawer is right EFerrari Mar 2012 #29
Your headline is misleading... TeeYiYi Mar 2012 #25
Not my intent, edited the title of the thread. Is that better? n/t Kurska Mar 2012 #27
Still unclear... TeeYiYi Mar 2012 #35
What facts are in dispute here? Kurska Mar 2012 #44
No worries. Thanks for trying. TeeYiYi Mar 2012 #59
Tomorrow? They had a field day with it today. Lilyeye Mar 2012 #32
The article says: eustus Mar 2012 #38
Are diamonds typically used in costume jewelry? Kurska Mar 2012 #46
Fake diamonds. Fake silver. eustus Mar 2012 #50
This is obvious to anyone who isn't intent on seeing Mr. Martin as a criminal alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #52
I'm sure information about this will come out. Kurska Mar 2012 #55
Mmmm hmmm alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #58
Hey if I could magically appraise jewelry from 400 miles away. Kurska Mar 2012 #61
Oh, what you're magically trying to do is fairly clear alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #63
Maybe it is a little hazy to me, what am I trying to do? Kurska Mar 2012 #66
I'll make a $100 donation to DU in your name alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #51
Even Taken At Face Value, Sir, The Stuff Has Zilch Monetary Value The Magistrate Mar 2012 #76
Wait, what have they described beyond diamonds and silver? Kurska Mar 2012 #81
It Was My Trade For A Number Of Years as a Younger Man, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2012 #82
And if you had the items in front of you, I'd defer to your expertise. Kurska Mar 2012 #85
We certainly DON'T know that alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #96
I didn't claim to know anything more than the rings are silver and earrings diamond. Kurska Mar 2012 #115
You don't know even that much, and to say otherwise is to lie alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #123
I'm clearly basing that claim off the police report, if it is wrong then I am wrong. Kurska Mar 2012 #129
Oh, my, look who suddenly turned faithful... alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #132
Never have I experienced so much gnashing of teeth over directly quoting an article. Kurska Mar 2012 #137
Oh please alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #138
I directly quoted the newspaper. Other people challenged the paper and the paper's source. Kurska Mar 2012 #140
I find you alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #142
The newspaper included the report, saying something about their belief in the validity of it. Kurska Mar 2012 #143
The newspaper rightly attributed the claim alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #144
Alright let me explain, newspapers will generally only print sources they find trustworthy. Kurska Mar 2012 #146
Attributing a claim of fact to a source alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #147
The report claims what it is saying is fact. Kurska Mar 2012 #148
Nonsense alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #149
Not Necessary, Sir: Mention Of Silver And Diamond In Conjunction Is Sufficient The Magistrate Mar 2012 #98
I found your post interesting. But there seems to have been a misunderstanding Kurska Mar 2012 #108
In Plain English, Sir 'Silver Wedding Rings And Earrings...' Applies 'Silver' To Both The Magistrate Mar 2012 #120
The exact phrase was "Silver wedding bands and earrings with diamonds" Kurska Mar 2012 #125
You don't know that they're even silver alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #127
Alright, something was found somewhere by someone Kurska Mar 2012 #131
That is, indeed, all you know alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #133
I deeply apologize for any deception, be it accidentally malicious or maliciously accidental. Kurska Mar 2012 #134
Whatever alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #135
Silver and gold of low purity grades. JVS Mar 2012 #78
Yes; diamond chips are often used in plate ware and in silver of low value. REP Mar 2012 #107
This article gives me the same feeling I arthritisR_US Mar 2012 #43
I really can't take this smearing of the murder victim anymore Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #65
+1000 Starry Messenger Mar 2012 #67
You are not alone, I feel the same way! arthritisR_US Mar 2012 #72
+1000 nt ecstatic Mar 2012 #77
I feel exactly the same way Marrah_G Mar 2012 #93
+10,000 uponit7771 Mar 2012 #103
It's absolutely disgusting alcibiades_mystery Mar 2012 #113
This may be the first time we ever agreed on ANYTHING. Tarheel_Dem Mar 2012 #141
I'm not at all surprised JonLP24 Mar 2012 #162
"I'm not at all surprised by that longtime DUer recommending this". Neither was I. Tarheel_Dem Mar 2012 #163
Third world rag Mosaic Mar 2012 #84
You're kind of insulting the Third World there, bro. Ken Burch Mar 2012 #114
I can make up shit too! And so what if he did? Should we all just be shot for bad deeds we have lonestarnot Mar 2012 #89
I wouldn't trust the cops to not plant 'evidence' like that Matariki Mar 2012 #139
So are you claiming... sarisataka Mar 2012 #150
Or that they planted evidence just to bust a black teenager. backscatter712 Mar 2012 #152
It happens... sarisataka Mar 2012 #154
Where do you get that I'm "claiming" anything in my post? Matariki Mar 2012 #158
I took your statement... sarisataka Mar 2012 #159
This is like attempting to smear a rape victim by saying she was sexually promiscuous. 6000eliot Mar 2012 #145
Perfect analogy. That's exactly what it's like. nt. Mariana Mar 2012 #156
Yet another analogy might be the Duke Lacrosse team... Zax2me Mar 2012 #160
No, it's not. Mariana Mar 2012 #161
irrelevant to the shooting.... Evasporque Mar 2012 #151
Completely fucking irrelevant. No judge would let defense bring this in. morningfog Mar 2012 #153
Who cares? Aerows Mar 2012 #155
It doesn't matter Catherine Vincent Mar 2012 #157
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trayvon Martin was also s...»Reply #6