Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Revolution Will Not Be Televised - The Obamacare Photos the MSM Doesn't Want You to See [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)30. Think about this
New Front in the Fight With Infant Mortality
By EDUARDO PORTER
As the health care bill that was to become known as Obamacare was making its way through Congress in 2009, Senator Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona, sought to block the requirement that health insurers cover a minimum set of health benefits determined by the federal government...Kyls proposed amendment embodied the conservative view: The Affordable Care Act that passed Congress in 2010 is an unacceptable intrusion into the private decisions of American families and businesses.
The Senate Finance Committee, by a vote of 14 to 9, rejected the amendment, opting for a different approach that could change, in subtle but profound ways, the nature of the American social contract.
Pregnant women, across the country and anywhere along the income spectrum, will for the first time have guaranteed access to health insurance offering a minimum standard of care that will help keep their babies alive.
The benefit may seem narrow. But it offers the best opportunity in a generation to tackle one of the United States most notorious stigmas: an intractably high infant mortality rate that hardly fits one of the richest, most technologically advanced nations on earth. If it succeeds, it could provide Americans with an alternative view of how government can serve society.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/23/business/health-law-is-a-new-front-in-the-fight-against-infant-mortality.html
By EDUARDO PORTER
As the health care bill that was to become known as Obamacare was making its way through Congress in 2009, Senator Jon Kyl, Republican of Arizona, sought to block the requirement that health insurers cover a minimum set of health benefits determined by the federal government...Kyls proposed amendment embodied the conservative view: The Affordable Care Act that passed Congress in 2010 is an unacceptable intrusion into the private decisions of American families and businesses.
The Senate Finance Committee, by a vote of 14 to 9, rejected the amendment, opting for a different approach that could change, in subtle but profound ways, the nature of the American social contract.
Pregnant women, across the country and anywhere along the income spectrum, will for the first time have guaranteed access to health insurance offering a minimum standard of care that will help keep their babies alive.
The benefit may seem narrow. But it offers the best opportunity in a generation to tackle one of the United States most notorious stigmas: an intractably high infant mortality rate that hardly fits one of the richest, most technologically advanced nations on earth. If it succeeds, it could provide Americans with an alternative view of how government can serve society.
- more -
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/23/business/health-law-is-a-new-front-in-the-fight-against-infant-mortality.html
Senator Bernie Sanders: We're Making Progress
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024763628
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Revolution Will Not Be Televised - The Obamacare Photos the MSM Doesn't Want You to See [View all]
ProSense
Mar 2014
OP
"Thank you for all that you do ProSense! You are awesome!" I second that emotion.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#34
Which is why she & her blue links are widely despised. They can't beat her, so they H8 her.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#48
Yup, the willfully ignorant try to roll over her 'fact checking' but reality bites 'em in the tail!
freshwest
Apr 2014
#54
They haven't figured out how to "stop the internet" yet - but they're trying.
polichick
Mar 2014
#17
Or a sporting event! Some things should be socialized. The ACA offers UHC in 2017. n/t
freshwest
Apr 2014
#64
Time to smack down the neverending hypocrisy of the GOP and all of their enablers:
freshwest
Apr 2014
#67
Ah, the wind beneath the wings. No credit in the media. ACA helps register them to vote (Kos)
freshwest
Apr 2014
#50
Imagine having your name on something that will empower millions to have more strength to resist the
freshwest
Apr 2014
#52
Obviously they're paid to stand there. They're illegals. It's people signing up twice
rpannier
Apr 2014
#57
You think he would be angry about millions of people gaining access to health care?
ProSense
Apr 2014
#66