Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
28. That is not a response to the Mother Jones article
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:08 PM
Apr 2014

But if you have particulars on the hospital in your area, please feel free to provide them. Let me provide just an excerpt from the article:

Catholic hospitals have been on a merger spree over the last few years, as Mother Jones reported earlier this year. Ever-expanding swaths of the country are now served only by a Catholic hospital, where patients have no choice but to receive care dictated by Catholic bishops whose religious edicts don't always align with what's best for a patient. Catholic hospitals generally follow the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care, which restrict abortion even in cases where a fetus isn't viable, for instance, a practice that has resulted in hospitals denying proper care for women suffering from miscarriages. The ACLU recently filed suit against the US Conference of Catholic Bishops on behalf of a Michigan woman who was suffering a second-trimester miscarriage and was sent home twice by a Catholic hospital, developing a serious infection because the hospital refused to even talk to her about the possibility of an abortion. Her baby died two hours after she miscarried.

Despite this heavy mixing of theology and health care, Catholic hospitals in 2011 received $27 billion—nearly half of their revenues—from public sources, according to a new report put out today by the American Civil Liberties Union and MergerWatch, a reproductive rights advocacy group. And that figure doesn't even include other tax subsidies the hospitals receive thanks to their nonprofit status.

The hospitals have long justified their tax status and restrictions on care by pointing to their religious mission of serving the poor and their delivery of charitable care. But the new ACLU/MergerWatch report suggests, and the chart below illustrates, Pope Francis might be on to something when he's said that the church needs to shift its priorities to focus less on abortion and more on the poor. MergerWatch data show that Catholic hospitals, where executives often earn multimillion-dollar salaries, aren't doing any better providing charity care than other religious non-profit hospitals that don't restrict care. They're barely any better than ordinary secular nonprofits....

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

well Did they or didn't they> that is the question. n/t hollysmom Apr 2014 #1
Link to original article gollygee Apr 2014 #2
Meanwhile the writer of the article and editors of the paper HERVEPA Apr 2014 #3
Abington and Holy Redeemer Freddie Apr 2014 #32
Thanks for the details Freddie HERVEPA Apr 2014 #41
There are plenty of regressive anti birth control Republicans. They seem to be given a pass. gordianot Apr 2014 #4
unfuckingbelievable mopinko Apr 2014 #5
For what? It is all for political reasons. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #15
So... Sweet Freedom Apr 2014 #6
As long as they drop a twenty in the collection cup...nt Wounded Bear Apr 2014 #33
I attended a meeting about this issue last month TexasProgresive Apr 2014 #7
I can imagine what that meeting was like! But, the good news is that... TreasonousBastard Apr 2014 #18
Lack of access to contraception is also a great loss for the poor theHandpuppet Apr 2014 #22
Put for-profit Catholic hospitals out of business. Loki Apr 2014 #8
A lot of poor people rely on those Catholic hospitals, wall_dish Apr 2014 #21
Really? theHandpuppet Apr 2014 #23
The one here does- TexasProgresive Apr 2014 #25
That is not a response to the Mother Jones article theHandpuppet Apr 2014 #28
The 3 in my area do. wall_dish Apr 2014 #27
So do most hospitals, Catholic or not theHandpuppet Apr 2014 #29
I have no idea if they do or don't and I'm not inclined to find out. wall_dish Apr 2014 #30
The "profits" are rolled back into improvements to plant, indigent health care - TexasProgresive Apr 2014 #24
My daughter has it to help with acne and to regulate periods. The added bonus is she is a bit more Ed Suspicious Apr 2014 #9
The simple solution? SCVDem Apr 2014 #10
This should be a given for progressives-nt Anansi1171 Apr 2014 #26
Let's hear how awesome the new church is now! Marrah_G Apr 2014 #11
prohibition in "name only" nothing will actually change OKNancy Apr 2014 #12
Get your facts out of here. We have false outrage to focus on... joeglow3 Apr 2014 #17
Sigh! Two posts showing how the situation... TreasonousBastard Apr 2014 #19
FOX23 tried to ask several follow up questions, in response to the company’s statement, but we were progressoid Apr 2014 #39
And so it begins.... blackspade Apr 2014 #13
The Catholic Church is making a bad mistake here. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #14
I agree. laundry_queen Apr 2014 #35
Women had to be super resourceful in those days. Now too, of course. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #38
But Pope Photo-Op drives a Renault!!... SidDithers Apr 2014 #16
lol April Fools! Boudica the Lyoness Apr 2014 #20
Practicing medicine without licenses or examinations. Orsino Apr 2014 #31
So...did they give that order? theboss Apr 2014 #34
The original article is a little better. progressoid Apr 2014 #40
Fucking Regressive Idiots. truebrit71 Apr 2014 #36
So, the argument is they are the good guys ohheckyeah Apr 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Doctors at an Oklahoma Ho...»Reply #28