Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
29. So do most hospitals, Catholic or not
Tue Apr 1, 2014, 01:10 PM
Apr 2014

What I would like to know is if any of the three hospitals you mention engage in these practices:

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/04/26/why-catholic-hospitals-should-scare-you/
(excerpt)
It’s probably not surprising that the most egregious violations come up in areas related to reproductive health. Catholic hospitals, almost without exception, refuse to offer abortion, contraception (emergency or otherwise), vasectomies, tubal ligations, or reproductive-health services like in-vitro fertilization.

In serious medical cases where pregnancy threatens the woman’s life, doctors are required to either send a woman off-site for her abortion or attempt to save both lives, even when the woman’s chances could be clearly and dramatically improved by terminating the pregnancy. In the case of ectopic pregnancy, a potentially fatal condition where the embryo is stuck in the Fallopian tube, Catholic medical ethics only permit the removal of the entire blocked tube, decreasing the woman’s future fertility by half. Doctors could extract the embryo without harming the tube, but that would defy Catholic moral teaching by causing an abortion directly. Removing the whole tube preserves an illusion of moral acceptability at the patient’s expense.

These moral contortions are being forced on doctors and patients who are not necessarily Catholic, oftentimes living in areas where they may not have access to alternatives. Poor women, who are more likely to rely on hospitals and hospital outpatient programs to meet their reproductive health needs, are disproportionately affected. And in an environment where Catholic organizations buy or merge with existing service providers with stunning regularity, staff and patients may find their health-care environment transformed suddenly and unexpectedly, forcing them into difficult situations.

Slightly less well known are the Catholic strictures on end-of-life care. Church dogma requires medical staff to provide certain life-support measures, like feeding tubes and intravenous hydration, indefinitely, even when the patient has given end-of-life directives in advance. In those cases, Catholic institutions will ignore the individual’s wishes if they conflict with Church teaching… even if the individual in question is not a Catholic. Given that, it’s troubling that Catholic organizations also own 1,400 long-term care and assisted living services and facilities, where their patients’ needs are subordinated to a doctrine they may not accept or understand....

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

well Did they or didn't they> that is the question. n/t hollysmom Apr 2014 #1
Link to original article gollygee Apr 2014 #2
Meanwhile the writer of the article and editors of the paper HERVEPA Apr 2014 #3
Abington and Holy Redeemer Freddie Apr 2014 #32
Thanks for the details Freddie HERVEPA Apr 2014 #41
There are plenty of regressive anti birth control Republicans. They seem to be given a pass. gordianot Apr 2014 #4
unfuckingbelievable mopinko Apr 2014 #5
For what? It is all for political reasons. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #15
So... Sweet Freedom Apr 2014 #6
As long as they drop a twenty in the collection cup...nt Wounded Bear Apr 2014 #33
I attended a meeting about this issue last month TexasProgresive Apr 2014 #7
I can imagine what that meeting was like! But, the good news is that... TreasonousBastard Apr 2014 #18
Lack of access to contraception is also a great loss for the poor theHandpuppet Apr 2014 #22
Put for-profit Catholic hospitals out of business. Loki Apr 2014 #8
A lot of poor people rely on those Catholic hospitals, wall_dish Apr 2014 #21
Really? theHandpuppet Apr 2014 #23
The one here does- TexasProgresive Apr 2014 #25
That is not a response to the Mother Jones article theHandpuppet Apr 2014 #28
The 3 in my area do. wall_dish Apr 2014 #27
So do most hospitals, Catholic or not theHandpuppet Apr 2014 #29
I have no idea if they do or don't and I'm not inclined to find out. wall_dish Apr 2014 #30
The "profits" are rolled back into improvements to plant, indigent health care - TexasProgresive Apr 2014 #24
My daughter has it to help with acne and to regulate periods. The added bonus is she is a bit more Ed Suspicious Apr 2014 #9
The simple solution? SCVDem Apr 2014 #10
This should be a given for progressives-nt Anansi1171 Apr 2014 #26
Let's hear how awesome the new church is now! Marrah_G Apr 2014 #11
prohibition in "name only" nothing will actually change OKNancy Apr 2014 #12
Get your facts out of here. We have false outrage to focus on... joeglow3 Apr 2014 #17
Sigh! Two posts showing how the situation... TreasonousBastard Apr 2014 #19
FOX23 tried to ask several follow up questions, in response to the company’s statement, but we were progressoid Apr 2014 #39
And so it begins.... blackspade Apr 2014 #13
The Catholic Church is making a bad mistake here. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #14
I agree. laundry_queen Apr 2014 #35
Women had to be super resourceful in those days. Now too, of course. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #38
But Pope Photo-Op drives a Renault!!... SidDithers Apr 2014 #16
lol April Fools! Boudica the Lyoness Apr 2014 #20
Practicing medicine without licenses or examinations. Orsino Apr 2014 #31
So...did they give that order? theboss Apr 2014 #34
The original article is a little better. progressoid Apr 2014 #40
Fucking Regressive Idiots. truebrit71 Apr 2014 #36
So, the argument is they are the good guys ohheckyeah Apr 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Doctors at an Oklahoma Ho...»Reply #29