Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Starbucks Boycott Over Marriage Equality Spurs Tenfold Backlash [View all]
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/03/26/451744/starbucks-boycott-over-marriage-equality-spurs-tenfold-backlash/Starbucks Boycott Over Marriage Equality Spurs Tenfold Backlash
By Zack Ford on Mar 26, 2012 at 12:35 pm
The National Organization for Marriages decision to boycott Starbucks for the companys support of the freedom to marry has turned out to be a dismal failure. In the five days since NOM launched its Dump Starbucks petition, it has only gotten 19,000 signatures, compared to the nearly 250,000 individuals who have signed SumOfUss retaliatory Thank You, Starbucks card. In fact, SumOfUs has gotten over 8,000 new signers since 8:30 this morning.
Not only is NOMs petition failing when it comes to numbers, its also failing when it comes to authenticity. As Jeremy Hooper has tracked, Dump Starbucks counts any information that is submitted, but that hasnt stopped NOM from boasting about its campaign repeatedly all weekend. Worse yet, it seems that the site cant even provide an accurate count of who is signing either that or the organization is intentionally manipulating the numbers to make the petition look more successful that it is, which of course it isnt anyway.
rest at link
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ask all the questions you want. That does not mean though to expect an answer.
William769
Mar 2012
#32
I know, it was already planned. And then when we got there, the shooting range was packed...
Ian David
Mar 2012
#59
It might have been a .44 magnum, not a .357. I remember it had bullets the size of my thumb.
Ian David
Mar 2012
#78
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
ellisonz
Mar 2012
#107