Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
3. This decision may facilitate a lot more people running for office...
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 12:24 PM
Apr 2014

...just not the right kind of people.

What the OP is about is that this change has the effect of privileging candidacies, which is odd. A person's influence power in an election increases the more candidates there are in the race.

So you get a consortium of 500 RWers willing to pony up $2,000 to each of 1000 candidacies. That works out the same as each of them giving $100,000 to one candidacy.

And the "Hillary is a criminal" Party is born. Because I don't see anything that limits the existence of a Party with the sole policy agenda of attacking Hillary.

And that Party, now funded, can operate the same as any other Party with all the powers we grant a cadidacy... like requiring TV stations sell them ads.

And so on.

It is a peculiar wrinkle, to limit donations based on the number of distinct candidacies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After this USSC decision,...»Reply #3