Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A sickening passage from Roberts’ opinion: [View all]Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)5. We have now gone back in time.. to the aristocratic rule
Prior to the great democratic revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries, Europe was dominated by an entrenched economic and political aristocracy that enjoyed special privileges and immunitiesenshrined in lawthat set it apart from the rest of society.
What has emerged today in the United States and the other capitalist countries is a new, financial aristocracy, consisting of multimillionaires and billionaires who make their wealth through financial speculation and manipulation, diverting untold resources from the development of the productive forces, infrastructure and the well-being of the population into their own bank accounts and stock portfolios.
Now they own the media and the election process which will guarantee their rule.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
+1000. Yep. They know what they are doing. But they are corrupt and don't give a shit.
GoneFishin
Apr 2014
#46
Worse yet, money is given to an opposing candidate to punish an incumbent for supporting
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#26
Yes. This decision needs to be challenged under the 5th and 14th Amendments, equal protection
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#31
Sure, but that process would merely wind up back in the Supreme Court's lap . . .
markpkessinger
Apr 2014
#47