Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
29. The Wall Street settlements and the new aristocracy
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 02:22 PM
Apr 2014

wsws.org, 2 April 2014

Last week, Bank of America became the latest major financial institution to announce a multi-billion-dollar settlement with US regulators of charges related to the 2008 financial meltdown. In a settlement worked out with the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the bank agreed to pay $5.83 billion in fines and buy back $3.2 billion in mortgage-backed securities from the government-sponsored mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to whom it sold the toxic assets in the run-up to the Wall Street crash. The settlement involves the largest fine levied by a single federal regulator in US history.

The agreement adds to the more than $100 billion in fines that have been levied by US regulators on major American and global banks since the financial crisis, more than half of which has been imposed over the past year.

The record size of the settlements points to the pervasiveness and scale of the criminality of the banks and their top officials. And yet, not a single leading bank executive has been criminally charged.

This is not for lack of evidence. The 2011 reports by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission document in considerable detail the fact that the 2008 crash was triggered by criminal wrongdoing by bank executives. Carl Levin, the chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations said that the committee had found “a financial snake pit rife with greed, conflicts of interest and wrongdoing.”

The most egregious crimes by Wall Street and international banks that have led to financial settlements with US regulators include the following:

* Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase and other banks sold mortgage-backed securities they knew to be virtually worthless, helping to trigger the 2008 crash. Even as the banks were selling these securities to investors, they were making huge profits by betting against the same securities, without telling those to whom they were palming off the securities.

* Major US banks, including Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Bank of America, illegally processed and even forged home mortgage documents in order to more quickly foreclose on the homes of families that had fallen behind on their mortgage payments. The number of people illegally foreclosed on will never be known because the Obama administration put a stop to the tally, but the figure is likely in the millions.

* Nearly all of the major US and international banks manipulated the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), the benchmark global interest rate used to set rates on some $350 trillion in financial assets, including mortgages, credit cards, student loans and bonds. By falsely reporting the interest they paid for loans from other banks, these institutions concealed their losses and increased their profits—at the expense of individual retirees, home and car owners, pension funds and municipalities all over the world.

* Major banks, including JPMorgan and UBS, were key partners in the $65 billion Ponzi scheme operated by Bernard Madoff. Earlier this year, JPMorgan, Madoff’s main banker, agreed to pay $2 billion to settle charges that it knowingly profited from Madoff’s scam. The deal shielded JPMorgan and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, from criminal charges through a “deferred prosecution” provision.


The settlements themselves were worked out between the banks and their regulators so as to have the maximum public relations effect, creating the appearance that the banks were being held accountable while minimizing the financial impact on the companies. The banks write off the fines—many of which are tax deductible—as part of the “cost of doing business.”

Not only have no top bankers been prosecuted, no major US banks have been broken up or nationalized. The big banks have grown even bigger and more powerful and have recovered their previous levels of profitability. Even taking into account the settlements with regulators, the six largest US banks made $76 billion in profits last year, just under the record set in 2006 and eclipsing every other year since 2008.

Wall Street pay, too, has hit record levels. The average bonus payout for Wall Street employees grew by 15 percent in 2013, reaching its highest level since the crash. Last week, both Bank of America and Morgan Stanley announced they were nearly doubling the pay of their respective chief executives for 2013.

SNIP...

The refusal of the government of the United States or that of any other major industrialized country to prosecute the bankers whose illegal operations triggered the crash of 2008 and subsequent global recession, or take any action against the banks that they head, demonstrates that society is once again dominated by a parasitic elite that, like the aristocrats of old, is above the law.

CONTINUED...

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/04/02/pers-a02.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rumy, Condi, Yoo, Bush, and Cheney laughing Supersedeas Mar 2014 #1
Impunity. Octafish Mar 2014 #7
Octafish provides the Coup de gras Puzzledtraveller Mar 2014 #2
Obama Adviser Cass Sunstein Rejects Prosecution of ''Non-Egregious'' Bush Crimes Octafish Mar 2014 #10
A cycle of criminalizing public service? mindwalker_i Mar 2014 #11
You have to be pretty fucking naive to expect an american president to prosecute CBGLuthier Mar 2014 #3
When did a Republican do something nice for a Democratic president? Octafish Mar 2014 #4
Then they are guilty as well.... TheNutcracker Mar 2014 #5
That is what it really is. TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #17
then go on the nearest streetcorner wearing a sandwich board calling Obama a war criminal. dionysus Apr 2014 #26
I didn't write the penalties or the law, if such was a bridge too far then why ratify? TheKentuckian Apr 2014 #31
So presidents aren't really about "liberty and justice for all" - right? polichick Apr 2014 #27
for some reason, a bunch of DUers think the public would get behind trying the bush admin for war dionysus Apr 2014 #28
Hey, wait a minute. (not really relevant, but still...) postulater Mar 2014 #6
Good catch! I noticed that, too, when I heard it on Democracy Now in 2009. Octafish Mar 2014 #13
We're just a bit defensive here in Wisconsin lately. postulater Mar 2014 #14
Feingold was the only one to vote against USA PATRIOT Act. Octafish Mar 2014 #15
du rec. xchrom Mar 2014 #8
The Wall Street settlements and the new aristocracy Octafish Apr 2014 #29
a two party system...where? Supersedeas Apr 2014 #30
"For whatever reason..." Hell Hath No Fury Mar 2014 #9
The reason is simple..it's so HE won't get held to account for the drones etc after HE leaves office truebrit71 Mar 2014 #12
Orwell got it wrong. Octafish Mar 2014 #16
Excellent post. woo me with science Mar 2014 #24
I was told right here on DU, TWICE yesterday, that there is no way a US President can be prosecuted sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #18
As long as there are two of us... Octafish Mar 2014 #19
Octafish, the feeling is mutual! sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #21
k&r, dammit. johnnyreb Mar 2014 #20
K&R woo me with science Mar 2014 #22
Some days it's easy to imagine living in the Wiemar Republic in 1938...k&r n/t bobthedrummer Mar 2014 #23
A zero-tolerance for IMPUNITY kick. n/t bobthedrummer Apr 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama Reluctance on Bush ...»Reply #29