Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
15. I think you are wrong
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 03:13 PM
Apr 2014

And to prove it, I am gonna offer you a job.

This job pays you $190,000 a year.

And it requires you to disseminate MY opinions, instead of your own ridiculous ones.

When I want your opinion, I will give it to you.

Are you tempted at all? Not even a little?

I think I could probably buy 70% of Americans with such a job.

I am pretty sure even I could be bought for that. I mean, why not? Look at the jobs I have already taken for much less.

I hate war, so my first job was with the DOD.
I think most television is a bunch of crap, so my second job was making satellite dishes.
I hate drunken-ness. So naturally I got a job as a janitor for a sports bar.
For three years I worked making over-priced pudding snacks. Not only that, but I was working for a Phillip Morris owned company. Hello, big tobacco, nice of you to hire me - for $18,000 a year.

And if that is not enough, well people like Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews make multiple million dollars a year.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And judges? jwirr Apr 2014 #1
Federal judges aren't elected. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #2
But the SC just struck down the campaign finance laws. CJCRANE Apr 2014 #3
It's the politicians. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #4
Thank you. But we aren't looking for solutions, we are hearing the same old rhetoric again sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #5
How do you propose they pay for their campaigns, if not for accepting money? PotatoChip Apr 2014 #8
What, then, is the harm in striking down the campaign finance limits? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #11
Limiting the amount is extremely important. PotatoChip Apr 2014 #18
I'll wager you managed to type that with a straight face. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #19
The fact that any bit, let alone *all* of that is going on PotatoChip Apr 2014 #20
Which of my cited examples ISN'T fascism? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #22
None of them are examples of fascism. PotatoChip Apr 2014 #25
. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #26
So you would accept a murdering fascist's description of his ideology PotatoChip Apr 2014 #27
I was referring to the buying of the judges. jwirr Apr 2014 #7
Have they been bought as opposed to working from ideology? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #9
Who knows? I think they are just as corrupt as the other repugs but that is my opinion. Everyone jwirr Apr 2014 #10
"I think they are just as corrupt as the other repugs" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #12
At least they are not trying to make my vote meaningless. jwirr Apr 2014 #13
Do you seriously believe that? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #17
Yep, those of us who are looking at everything with our eyes wide open truedelphi Apr 2014 #16
Yep. I don't see many politicians turning down corporate money..they solicit it. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2014 #6
Politicians, like hedge fund managers, only care about legality, not morality. n/t truedelphi Apr 2014 #14
I think you are wrong hfojvt Apr 2014 #15
This system attracts corrupt politicians - those who want... polichick Apr 2014 #21
The problem is: human nature BainsBane Apr 2014 #23
Yes, it is human nature. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #24
The two go hand-in-hand. Flies are drawn to crap, ants run to sugar, bees flock to the honeypot. riqster Apr 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The problem isn't money c...»Reply #15