Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
16. Yep, those of us who are looking at everything with our eyes wide open
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 03:17 PM
Apr 2014

Know that party labels are as much of a lie as anything else...

I mean what the heck would FDR think of Obama? FDR's philosophy was to actually address Congress and bully pulpit for his ideals. Obama stipulates that the separation of the various branches of government mean that he has to sit it out. But behind the scenes, he allows people like Rahm Emanuel to actually write up legislation! (And the bully pulpit was out with regrs to health care reform, but apparently the bully pulpit is okay, when it comes to getting a war on. Then the President suddenly feels the bully pulpit is in order.)

And of course, despite his campaign promise to the middle class that banks would be regulated if they didn't loan to Main Street, he decided upon election to refer to the Heads at Treasury and the Fed, who could care less about any regulations. Which is why we will end up with another terrible economic collapse, which will make '08 and '09 look like a picnic.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And judges? jwirr Apr 2014 #1
Federal judges aren't elected. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #2
But the SC just struck down the campaign finance laws. CJCRANE Apr 2014 #3
It's the politicians. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #4
Thank you. But we aren't looking for solutions, we are hearing the same old rhetoric again sabrina 1 Apr 2014 #5
How do you propose they pay for their campaigns, if not for accepting money? PotatoChip Apr 2014 #8
What, then, is the harm in striking down the campaign finance limits? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #11
Limiting the amount is extremely important. PotatoChip Apr 2014 #18
I'll wager you managed to type that with a straight face. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #19
The fact that any bit, let alone *all* of that is going on PotatoChip Apr 2014 #20
Which of my cited examples ISN'T fascism? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #22
None of them are examples of fascism. PotatoChip Apr 2014 #25
. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #26
So you would accept a murdering fascist's description of his ideology PotatoChip Apr 2014 #27
I was referring to the buying of the judges. jwirr Apr 2014 #7
Have they been bought as opposed to working from ideology? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #9
Who knows? I think they are just as corrupt as the other repugs but that is my opinion. Everyone jwirr Apr 2014 #10
"I think they are just as corrupt as the other repugs" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #12
At least they are not trying to make my vote meaningless. jwirr Apr 2014 #13
Do you seriously believe that? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #17
Yep, those of us who are looking at everything with our eyes wide open truedelphi Apr 2014 #16
Yep. I don't see many politicians turning down corporate money..they solicit it. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2014 #6
Politicians, like hedge fund managers, only care about legality, not morality. n/t truedelphi Apr 2014 #14
I think you are wrong hfojvt Apr 2014 #15
This system attracts corrupt politicians - those who want... polichick Apr 2014 #21
The problem is: human nature BainsBane Apr 2014 #23
Yes, it is human nature. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #24
The two go hand-in-hand. Flies are drawn to crap, ants run to sugar, bees flock to the honeypot. riqster Apr 2014 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The problem isn't money c...»Reply #16