Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So let's see here. A 5-4 SCOTUS decision split exactly on party lines. [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)48. Yer darn tootin! I've had enough, though--and I think a lot of us have!
I agree with you about the state forums, too--I put stuff up in mine on occasion, and just get responses from the few die-hards...whereas in DUs past, those groups used to be jumping.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So let's see here. A 5-4 SCOTUS decision split exactly on party lines. [View all]
DanTex
Apr 2014
OP
I'm with you 100% but don't let this one be the reason you get a post hidden.
Number23
Apr 2014
#107
I tried to comment on a recent one of his...and then my mobile wouldn't send.
BlancheSplanchnik
Apr 2014
#52
Democrats had a win yesterday. Expect increased demonization from the usuals. They have an.....
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#3
Damn, that's right on point! Perfectly illustrated! Well done, you! Wish I could rec your post! nt
MADem
Apr 2014
#4
And that has to start with the local level. On Ed last night he was talking about how and why the
jwirr
Apr 2014
#5
"All politics are local". I forget who said it, but it's never been more true than today. The....
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#10
I should've known. He was a helluva legislator, and apparently a soothsayer as well.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#29
One good way to spot 'em is they rarely, if ever, participate in threads that aren't about Obama.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#45
Yes. I'd hope those complaining about not getting single-payer in 2009-10 would spend more time
Chathamization
Apr 2014
#74
DING! DING! DING! You have characterized them perfectly. We can't move forward with these....
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#75
Exactly....we have to get the mushy middle off the couches to vote in the midterms!
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#81
My father (rest his soul) was one of those. He thought his vote was too important to use it in....
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#84
Yep....you have to appear POWERFUL to appeal to those....you have to make them understand
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#87
Exactly. But I'm under no illusion that we're actually dealing with "Democrats". It's the internet.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#90
It's time to move beyond them. Let them do their 3rd party thing, and leave Dems the hell alone.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#106
That should include their own site. How does Third Party Underground grab you? I'd donate just....
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#113
As long as they take the Putinistas/Assangeanistas/Naderites & Greenwaldians too. nt
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#141
And TWO of the justices that gave the election to Shrub had those lopsided votes 30 years ago.
hobbit709
Apr 2014
#15
Yup, this one is on Nader and his supporters too. We all warned Naderites about the SCOTUS
stevenleser
Apr 2014
#60
Of course, almost all analyses show that Nader wasn't responsible for Gore "losing" nt
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2014
#126
If we lose the Senate - then maybe progressives should leave the Democratic Party en masse
Anansi1171
Apr 2014
#30
I know but lame ducks tend to lose their political capital pretty fast. n/t
totodeinhere
Apr 2014
#39
I Think that's a Mis-characterization of a Valid Point Some People are Making
fascisthunter
Apr 2014
#59
The point is broader than for whom you personally voted. It's the philosophy you are espousing.
stevenleser
Apr 2014
#70
if only 550 of the 300,000 registered Democrats that voted for bush had instead voted for Gore...
frylock
Apr 2014
#86
Perhaps you should seek out a site that doesn't have a partisan "Democratic" mission then. This one
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2014
#69