Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,426 posts)

14. there were no limits on that even before today's decision

Wed Apr 2, 2014, 04:41 PM

Apr 2014

I dont think there is a strong legal basis to get that to stop or a work around like I proposed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I have an idea that will nueter the scotus decision today [View all] srican69 Apr 2014 OP

Hmmm. raging moderate Apr 2014 #1

As you said it won't pass lostincalifornia Apr 2014 #2

What I would like to see randr Apr 2014 #4

I think they'd spend their money lobbying against that bill Boom Sound 416 Apr 2014 #5

Keep dreaming badtoworse Apr 2014 #6

201 c (4)'s do not have to divulge the identity of their donors Bandit Apr 2014 #7

Most of the problems are not direct donations to candidates Bandit Apr 2014 #13

there were no limits on that even before today's decision srican69 Apr 2014 #14

I thought that said "neuter the scrotus" Warren DeMontague Apr 2014 #8

Publicly funded elections with tax dollars upaloopa Apr 2014 #10

those with a stake in a corrupt system will fight to protect it. unblock Apr 2014 #12

A question on specifics: Dr. Strange Apr 2014 #15

Would a better idea be to allow SwankyXomb Apr 2014 #17