General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: People suffering from severe depression should be banned from purchasing/carrying guns [View all]Sancho
(9,206 posts)it would likely be versions of state licenses, but debating the constitutionality is not a problem here. Obviously, licenses are legal in all 50 states and required for people to engage in some activities. States already have carry permits and reciprocity, so we know gun licenses are legal and have a federal impact.
The percentage would not matter. It would prevent some mass shootings, suicides, etc. We don't know the impact until we try it.
Licensing would have a measurable effect on some people with mental/emotional problems. Many of those (like the recent mass shootings) were known to be unstable - but there was no mechanism to prevent them from buying or possessing guns.
It would not catch everyone (of course).
Just like having a license whenever you drive (even if out of state), you'd have to have a current license to buy, transport, or possess a gun. Simple. Probably proof of insurance too. Criminals would find it much harder to keep guns, buy ammo, etc. but this part of the OP is about screening for mental and emotional worthiness to have a gun.
You may even have a diagnosis (like a phobia; fear of flying) and be completely fine to be licensed to possess a gun. I suggesting a simply screening and background check for obvious issues. Not a complete psychoanalysis.