Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Charles Koch whines in WSJ op-ed [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)17. Charles Koch Explains Why He Is So Crazy
Charles Koch Explains Why He Is So Crazy
By Jonathan Chait
The Wall Street Journal's editorial page owns the deluded self-pitying billionaire screed genre, and today, it brings us Charles Koch. From the outside, Koch would appear to have it pretty good. He owns a vast fortune inherited in substantial part from his father. He commands enormous political influence, with hundreds of politicians and other political elites at his beck and call. But Kochs view of himself is as a kind of ragtag freedom fighter hunted nearly to extinction.
Here is Koch attempting to explain the major source of his grievance:
So the trouble is that his critics attempt to discredit and intimidate him and employ character assassination. All these terms appear to be Koch synonyms for saying things about Charles Koch that Charles Koch does not agree with. In the kind of free and open debate he imagines, Koch would continue to use his fortune to wield massive political influence, and nobody would ever say anything about him that makes him unhappy.
Luckily, Koch restrains himself from overtly comparing the Obama administration to Hitler and Stalin, instead likening it to unnamed 20th-century despots." No character assassination here!
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/04/charles-koch-explains-why-he-is-so-crazy.html
By Jonathan Chait
The Wall Street Journal's editorial page owns the deluded self-pitying billionaire screed genre, and today, it brings us Charles Koch. From the outside, Koch would appear to have it pretty good. He owns a vast fortune inherited in substantial part from his father. He commands enormous political influence, with hundreds of politicians and other political elites at his beck and call. But Kochs view of himself is as a kind of ragtag freedom fighter hunted nearly to extinction.
Here is Koch attempting to explain the major source of his grievance:
Instead of encouraging free and open debate, collectivists strive to discredit and intimidate opponents. They engage in character assassination. (I should know, as the almost daily target of their attacks.) This is the approach that Arthur Schopenhauer described in the 19th century, that Saul Alinky famously advocated in the 20th, and that so many despots have infamously practiced. Such tactics are the antithesis of what is required for a free societyand a telltale sign that the collectivists do not have good answers.
So the trouble is that his critics attempt to discredit and intimidate him and employ character assassination. All these terms appear to be Koch synonyms for saying things about Charles Koch that Charles Koch does not agree with. In the kind of free and open debate he imagines, Koch would continue to use his fortune to wield massive political influence, and nobody would ever say anything about him that makes him unhappy.
Luckily, Koch restrains himself from overtly comparing the Obama administration to Hitler and Stalin, instead likening it to unnamed 20th-century despots." No character assassination here!
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/04/charles-koch-explains-why-he-is-so-crazy.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not necessarily true. Kock and allies want taxpayers to pay for their business costs
Larkspur
Apr 2014
#11
Koch is a Thatcherite. He doesn't belief the public should own anything in commonwealth
HereSince1628
Apr 2014
#39
One More For The 'Expressing Disagreement Is Bullying Me With Censorship' Crew, Ma'am
The Magistrate
Apr 2014
#5
If someone says "Marxist", "Collectivist" or "statist", I INSTANTLY don't take them seriously.
HughBeaumont
Apr 2014
#9
Well, the more CORPORATIONS control, the greater the disaster for the majority of mankind,
KittyWampus
Apr 2014
#14
Ironic, isn't it that this oped appears on the same day he is empowered to buy politicians
tularetom
Apr 2014
#16
Indeed...so when Glenn Greenwald appears at a donor benefits dinner for CATO,
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#30
Large Corporations are Collectivist organizations engaged in collectivist activity.
Ikonoklast
Apr 2014
#25
Hey, Charles, have some limburger cheese with your whine, you sick, greedy stinkbug. n/t
freshwest
Apr 2014
#52