Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Charles Koch whines in WSJ op-ed [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)21. Steve Benen:
<...>
Rather, the underlying issue is one of a failure of self-awareness. The Koch brothers, as has been well documented, arent exactly struggling to communicate their ideas with the public. Theyve invested tens of millions of dollars in a massive political operation, including brutal attack ads targeting policymakers whove dared to pursue a progressive policy vision.
Indeed, reading Kochs op-ed and its complaints about character assassination immediately made me wonder if the conservative billionaire has actually seen any of the anti-Democratic commercials hes helped subsidize.
Its true that the Koch brothers, up until fairly recently, were not commonly recognized as major political players. Their names rarely passed through Democrats lips. But as theyve become more deeply involved in policy and campaign debates, effectively creating a well-financed operation that would rival that of a modestly sized national party, the Koch brothers have been subjected to scrutiny and denunciations.
<...>
Its what makes Charles Kochs complaints unpersuasive. It would appear from his op-ed that hes comfortable financing attack ads targeting Democrats, but hes outraged by Democrats who respond in kind with attack ads of their own. When he makes the case for a regressive vision, Koch seems himself as merely celebrating the restoration of a free society, but when his foes make the case for a progressive vision, theyre radicals trying to stifle debate.
- more -
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/charles-koch-presents-his-defense-against
Rather, the underlying issue is one of a failure of self-awareness. The Koch brothers, as has been well documented, arent exactly struggling to communicate their ideas with the public. Theyve invested tens of millions of dollars in a massive political operation, including brutal attack ads targeting policymakers whove dared to pursue a progressive policy vision.
Indeed, reading Kochs op-ed and its complaints about character assassination immediately made me wonder if the conservative billionaire has actually seen any of the anti-Democratic commercials hes helped subsidize.
Its true that the Koch brothers, up until fairly recently, were not commonly recognized as major political players. Their names rarely passed through Democrats lips. But as theyve become more deeply involved in policy and campaign debates, effectively creating a well-financed operation that would rival that of a modestly sized national party, the Koch brothers have been subjected to scrutiny and denunciations.
<...>
Its what makes Charles Kochs complaints unpersuasive. It would appear from his op-ed that hes comfortable financing attack ads targeting Democrats, but hes outraged by Democrats who respond in kind with attack ads of their own. When he makes the case for a regressive vision, Koch seems himself as merely celebrating the restoration of a free society, but when his foes make the case for a progressive vision, theyre radicals trying to stifle debate.
- more -
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/charles-koch-presents-his-defense-against
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not necessarily true. Kock and allies want taxpayers to pay for their business costs
Larkspur
Apr 2014
#11
Koch is a Thatcherite. He doesn't belief the public should own anything in commonwealth
HereSince1628
Apr 2014
#39
One More For The 'Expressing Disagreement Is Bullying Me With Censorship' Crew, Ma'am
The Magistrate
Apr 2014
#5
If someone says "Marxist", "Collectivist" or "statist", I INSTANTLY don't take them seriously.
HughBeaumont
Apr 2014
#9
Well, the more CORPORATIONS control, the greater the disaster for the majority of mankind,
KittyWampus
Apr 2014
#14
Ironic, isn't it that this oped appears on the same day he is empowered to buy politicians
tularetom
Apr 2014
#16
Indeed...so when Glenn Greenwald appears at a donor benefits dinner for CATO,
msanthrope
Apr 2014
#30
Large Corporations are Collectivist organizations engaged in collectivist activity.
Ikonoklast
Apr 2014
#25
Hey, Charles, have some limburger cheese with your whine, you sick, greedy stinkbug. n/t
freshwest
Apr 2014
#52