This message was self-deleted by its author

[LeftofObama]

37. Here ya go. I'm assuming this is the one.

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Thu Apr 3, 2014, 11:45 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Jesus Christ...I'm not defending them
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4775692

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Whoa, dude seems to step back.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Apr 3, 2014, 12:02 PM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Whether defending them or not, no excuse to tell poster to Fuck themselves.
Simple.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The poster was NOT defending the rapists and Ohio Joe knows it. It has become common to attack any attempt at nuance, or anything short of a call for castration, as "Defending the rapists". It's inflammatory bullshit and should not be rewarded when it incites an uncivil reply.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: UGH
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Inappropriate due to word choice, but understandable through context. Guy was not defending the rapists, and it is an insult to be mentioned defending rapists. Guy was clarifying points on the case.

If he was wrong, correct it.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The posting person needs a time out.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.