General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Epic win for a three year old little boy who narrowly misses being lost to adoption! [View all]pnwmom
(110,254 posts)the adoption agency notified him of the adoption in March, six months before the baby was born. So he had plenty of time to start a paternity action. He needed to take action in some way to claim he was the father (not just say "if" or "maybe" he was the father.) Even a young man would know at LEAST to consult a lawyer. (He did consult one after the adoption and he spent much more for that lawyer than if he hadn't delayed.)
There have to be deadlines for the sake of the baby, or no adoptive parents could ever go through an adoption without being afraid that a father could appear or change his mind in the future. This would interfere with the bonding process and wouldn't be good for a baby. (Because of cases like this more people turn to international adoptions than to open US adoptions, which are better for the children.)
The other thing he didn't do, at least according to the articles I saw, that many states require of a putative father, is show an interest in helping to take care of the pregnant mother. If he had offered at least some financial support that would also have strengthened his case.
He acknowledged feeling that his relationship with the woman wasn't serious and that he didn't want it to be; also, that he doubted she was really pregnant and thought it was trickery or mind games; and when the agency called, he said, "if" she was pregnant he wanted the baby. I think he was negative or ambivalent about becoming a father and that's why he didn't stop the adoption while he easily could have. Like a lot of people, he didn't make up his mind he wanted something till it was almost too late.
Lucky for him, and I hope his son, he was able to get the adoption overturned. But he could have and should have acted much sooner and saved himself and the adoptive parents a lot of agony.