Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Paulina Gretzky makes Golf Digest cover because she looks really good in lycra.Is this bad for golf? [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)88. "No one--repeat NO ONE hs made her attractiveness the specific issue, except YOU"
Uh -- the thread title itself is about how Ms. Gretzky looks really good in lycra and your posts, including this one, is a complaint that she got the cover when other female golfers didn't.
Tell me: WHY did Ms. Gretzky get the cover?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
122 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Paulina Gretzky makes Golf Digest cover because she looks really good in lycra.Is this bad for golf? [View all]
The Straight Story
Apr 2014
OP
Honestly... You want to defend this? Really? Nice slap to all the female pros who have earned
hlthe2b
Apr 2014
#12
And your post seems little more than slut-shaming with baseless accusations of sluttiness.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#57
It has nothing to do with the woman portrayed and everything to do with the fact they chose
hlthe2b
Apr 2014
#60
Is there, like, a checklist of all the covers they must publish before they're allowed to
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#68
Your agenda is to apply straw-man arguments where they don't exist to flame bait
hlthe2b
Apr 2014
#84
"No one--repeat NO ONE hs made her attractiveness the specific issue, except YOU"
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#88
I dunno, but the same company (Conde Nast) owns a few other mags that may shed some light
The Straight Story
Apr 2014
#90
From your list let's see what other magazines Ms. Gretzky might qualify for --
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#92
It's been on the TV news because some women golfers felt disrespected by the cover. I don't blame
seaglass
Apr 2014
#8
You said we wouldn't know about it without this OP and I said the story has been on the news - is
seaglass
Apr 2014
#25
No woman on the cover since 2008? Now that's important info. It brings this cover into perspective
mulsh
Apr 2014
#24
Well as far as I know it did start with LPGAers speaking out about the cover. Do you consider
seaglass
Apr 2014
#40
We probably fit into upaloopa's category of men haters who think old white men are the cause
seaglass
Apr 2014
#19
Why would you think no one reads your posts? I don't know any men haters so I can't say they
seaglass
Apr 2014
#37
From the post of yours that another posted upstream, many would see your comment as projection.
hlthe2b
Apr 2014
#31
He most certainly did accuse some Du women of "hating men" You are being disingenuous
hlthe2b
Apr 2014
#51
They must interest you some, you brought up the topic via a previous post
The Straight Story
Apr 2014
#65
Given, he too admits his words were "poorly chosen", you missed making your case.
hlthe2b
Apr 2014
#61
Yeah... (and undoubtedly the less model-like appearance, the more they appear) n/t
hlthe2b
Apr 2014
#29
They still don't have anything to do with who is featured on the cover of a magazine.
kcr
Apr 2014
#100
It says that golf is no more (or less)sexist than the rest of the sporting world.
riqster
Apr 2014
#10
very few of the LPGA golfers appear on their cover, even when they win majors..hence the controversy
spanone
Apr 2014
#64
Her pose is intentionally provocative (ass in the air). She/they could have done something way less
KittyWampus
Apr 2014
#82