Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,366 posts)

9. Indeed 'secerability' is of the issues being argued before the court.

Tue Mar 27, 2012, 03:05 PM

Mar 2012

This article contains discussion of the issue: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/opinion/the-severability-doctrine.html

Note that the Obama administration is arguing _against_ severability.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So do my older kids lose healthcare if this is overturned? [View all] adigal Mar 2012 OP

Looks like it atreides1 Mar 2012 #1

No, your son will be covered as it is law now.... a kennedy Mar 2012 #2

The problem is if the mandate is overturned... orwell Mar 2012 #5

Out of luck with pre-existing conditions? HockeyMom Mar 2012 #3

OK, thanks! I hope they don't lose coverage adigal Mar 2012 #4

The only correct answer is "We don't know". Xithras Mar 2012 #7

Indeed 'secerability' is of the issues being argued before the court. PoliticAverse Mar 2012 #9

I Would Not Trust The Court TheMastersNemesis Mar 2012 #8

This would be the death knell of the Republican party adigal Mar 2012 #12

So we're trusting the same group Politicalboi Mar 2012 #10

I would suspect that everyone's premiums would rise drastically sadbear Mar 2012 #11