Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)

5. Before we go jumping to contusions let's look at the pro's and con's.

Reply to WilliamPitt (Original post)

Tue Apr 8, 2014, 05:56 PM

Apr 2014

Maybe I should have said the good and the bad because we know the "con's" love the pipeline (along with the "Team&quot .

So what is good about this pipeline? Ok, I'm stumped. Maybe the 10 minimum wage jobs created.

Oh yeah, the expensive oil will help us reduce our dependency on cheap oil. Actually this oil that will travel across the continental USofA will all go to China, except for what is spilled in the USofA.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

100+ Scientists and Economists Urge President Obama and Secretary Kerry to Reject Keystone XL [View all] WilliamPitt Apr 2014 OP

Word, my dear Will. K&R n/t CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2014 #1

K&R fleabiscuit Apr 2014 #2

Huge K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2014 #3

Is this one of those threads that will be avoided by the BOG'sters? nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #4

Nothing in that that post any Democrat can get upset about. Autumn Apr 2014 #6

Before we go jumping to contusions let's look at the pro's and con's. rhett o rick Apr 2014 #5

it's a good thing for the oil industry and the politicians bought and paid for by the same. But for neverforget Apr 2014 #7

I believe he will wait until after the 2014 Elections to see how this goes...and that KoKo Apr 2014 #8