Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
7. Underwater acoustic expert?
Tue Apr 8, 2014, 06:19 PM
Apr 2014

I love how everyone on DU is suddenly an expert in so many complex things. Having detected a highly attenuated signal at a location in very deep ocean doesn't pinpoint the location of jack shit.

Anything that floats is long gone from the surface from where anything is resting on the bottom of a very deep ocean. I suppose they should just swim down and have a look.

Let's say you knew, within a radius of even a few miles, where a relatively small object is resting on the bottom of the Indian Ocean. Okay, what's your next move?

It's not as if the fuselage is resting intact down there, so even if you then do a sonar survey of the bottom in this 5 mile radius (i.e. about 80 square mile) area, you are looking for things maybe twenty feet large and trying to decide whether you are seeing an object, surface irregularities, or just noise.

But, yeah, head on down there with your deep seawater penetrating super vision and sort them all out.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It makes no sense unless the batteries died seveneyes Apr 2014 #1
I'm sorry but there is no chance that they forgot to document the coodinates ... Iwasthere Apr 2014 #2
Ever heard of thermoclines? nt oldhippie Apr 2014 #8
Well they may just have a azimuth, need 2 fixes to triangulate? n/t EX500rider Apr 2014 #3
Yes, in order to find the plane, I agree ... Iwasthere Apr 2014 #4
Exactly. ManiacJoe Apr 2014 #9
Sound travels very fast under water digonswine Apr 2014 #5
There is a lot more to this than just returning to the same location. Glassunion Apr 2014 #6
THEY ARE TRYING TO RELOCATE THE F%$#king PING Iwasthere Apr 2014 #12
Yes, they are trying to relocate the ping. Glassunion Apr 2014 #14
Underwater acoustic expert? jberryhill Apr 2014 #7
Thank you Cirque du So-What Apr 2014 #11
Huh? Iwasthere Apr 2014 #13
I doubt they heard pings AngryAmish Apr 2014 #10
You don't 'hear' pings Cirque du So-What Apr 2014 #15
"Hear" is a loose term. It's still a sound wave. Glassunion Apr 2014 #16
Yep Cirque du So-What Apr 2014 #17
Quite true. nt Glassunion Apr 2014 #19
prove me wrong AngryAmish Apr 2014 #20
The whole thing smells of one big massive coverup Reter Apr 2014 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They're going to spend 4 ...»Reply #7