Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I guess to some Politicalboi Mar 2012 #1
I know the costs are different but the concept is the same Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #2
If the health insurance industry takes over the supermarket chains we're really fucked! Better Believe It Mar 2012 #3
Holler at me when we are paying taxes for our healthcare TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #4
We already were before the ACA jeff47 Mar 2012 #8
Someone really smart once said zipplewrath Mar 2012 #5
I know that someone on DU said that Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #6
Everyone DOESN'T pay taxes zipplewrath Mar 2012 #7
The penalty to not get insurance is limited to 2.5% of one's income and there are subsidies for Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #11
It is "unprecidented" zipplewrath Mar 2012 #15
How about we cut out that for-profit middleman? enlightenment Mar 2012 #9
That's a separate issue. I support single payer health care at the state level Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #12
Uh, no it is not separate. Other countries use a mandate, not one of them allows profit Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #21
The subject of my post is the govenment compelling people to buy a good or service they might not Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #22
Because the Congress needs bribe/lobby money and they're not near as likely to get so much if Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #32
Just so people get it.... Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #13
Unfortunately that guy is long gone from the political scene... n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2012 #14
I miss that guy zipplewrath Mar 2012 #16
You never know who'll show up during an election campaign. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2012 #17
Reunion concert zipplewrath Mar 2012 #19
If you don't have the money for the house, the government gives it to you treestar Mar 2012 #34
Would you support mandated food insurance instead of food stamps? girl gone mad Mar 2012 #10
food stamps are a form of mandated food insurance. People pay for them with their tax dollars Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #18
One is a contract with the government and one is with a private, extremely rich, corporation joeglow3 Mar 2012 #26
You can walk into an er, receive care (very expensive care), and then not pay for it Native Mar 2012 #20
funny story about that hfojvt Mar 2012 #35
You're talking about a different situation. Native Mar 2012 #37
Also too, if you don't buy food for your kids you get your kids taken away from you. applegrove Mar 2012 #23
Not true SATIRical Mar 2012 #24
Bad analogy SATIRical Mar 2012 #25
Some don't pay income tax but they pay other taxes Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #31
But some people do know people who own a cow SATIRical Mar 2012 #36
Taxes aren't the same thing as forced private purchases. Romulox Mar 2012 #27
The only difference is that the money goes directly to the insurance companies Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #28
There isn't as much difference as you might think Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #29
How does this intersect with the Third Amendment analysis? AngryAmish Mar 2012 #30
I'm sorry. I'm not a legal expert. Tony_FLADEM Mar 2012 #33
Regarding the analogy that buying something from a private company hughee99 Mar 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Regarding the analogy tha...»Reply #14