Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Russia: Constitutional Court Upholds ‘Foreign Agents’ Law [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)20. "No doubt Russian laws 'impede' human rights
...But as its reported here, it doesn't appear to be THIS law."
Which "stale rhetoric" is that?
"Eh? Are you even following? I'm saying that attempting to pass off foreign monetary support as domestic is no more dramatic as a crime than running the whole banking sector like a casino."
That's absurd.
"Or perhaps you are trying to equate finance with association? They are not one and the same. "
You're the one who brought up "Glass-Steagall," which, in fact, criminalized the activities that lead to the financial crisis.
Apparently, you're the one not "following" the your own attempts to excuse the atrocity described in the OP.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, Sir, You Mis-Spoke, To A Degree Which Calls Into Question If You Understand The Basics Here
The Magistrate
Apr 2014
#10
Your draconian take on the finance law fell apart, then changed the subject. n/t
cprise
Apr 2014
#57
Look at this thread: You started out with a bogus defense of legalized persecution
ProSense
Apr 2014
#58
So condemning lethal force in response to beatings is 'support of police brutality'.
cprise
Apr 2014
#63