Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mr.Turnip

(645 posts)
32. O im not entirely discounting them.
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 05:51 PM
Mar 2012

But to say that because we had one tough day of questioning (after a good one, I know the Mandate wasn't discussed much yesterday but when it was Roberts rejected the argument used against it) means WE ARE DOOMED.

However based on past events I am cautiously optimistic, while Kennedy and Roberts were harsh at first they showed quite a few sympathies with the Government's argument when it came time to question the opposition.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thank you for your concern. aquart Mar 2012 #1
You'd think that the Repugs would be saying that nobody would coverage without zbdent Mar 2012 #4
Where have you been that last 15 years. The country has turned hard right and racist. This is not still_one Mar 2012 #13
Who the hell even REMEMBERS it was originally a Republican idea? BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #25
You should never make assumptions about the outcome The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2012 #2
Pree-cisely! nt hifiguy Mar 2012 #9
I agree. In the last analysis they know kenny blankenship Mar 2012 #17
I'm not "digging the grave" yet, however..... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #29
Actually, I have the opposite impression Blasphemer Mar 2012 #3
My experience with Uncle Clarence bongbong Mar 2012 #7
For some reason, every time I see Uncle Ruckus on hifiguy Mar 2012 #21
I'm sure that's one reason why the SCOTUS won't EVER be televised..... a kennedy Mar 2012 #39
They are stringing the rightwing along underpants Mar 2012 #11
I hope your assessment is right, but I am very skeptical /nt still_one Mar 2012 #18
I am getting worried now that Toobin said it doesn't look good underpants Mar 2012 #19
sorry, I hope toobin is wrong in his assessment /nt still_one Mar 2012 #20
He also commented on Thomas' 'silence'. trof Mar 2012 #34
???? BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #28
That is the wonderful bush legacy /nt still_one Mar 2012 #14
Yep, Reagan and Bush I & II fucked us. trof Mar 2012 #35
I am PRAYING that you are right about Roberts & Kennedy.... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #27
You wish. SpencerShay Mar 2012 #5
Are you nuts, where do you jump to that conclusion? /nt still_one Mar 2012 #15
The sky is falling! FSogol Mar 2012 #6
It will be when civil rights are turned over to the states /nt still_one Mar 2012 #16
That's what judges do. hifiguy Mar 2012 #8
Then explain why NONE of the four liberal judges asked no "skeptical" questions..... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #23
The judges have to back their opinions up, too. sadbear Mar 2012 #10
I almost hurt myself laughing at that one. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #12
No one wants to be the next Roger B. Taney. sadbear Mar 2012 #31
Roberts very nearly said that word for word hifiguy Mar 2012 #33
It's already too late to worry about that. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #36
That was pre-Roberts Blasphemer Mar 2012 #37
You are correct, i should have used Citizen's United as the defining moment for Roberts. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #38
He was also skeptical of the opposition's argument against it when they were questioned. Mr.Turnip Mar 2012 #22
Listen for yourself malaise Mar 2012 #24
You want to know a law that was put in court and questioned heavily? Mr.Turnip Mar 2012 #26
please, don't upset the doom & gloomers spanone Mar 2012 #30
O im not entirely discounting them. Mr.Turnip Mar 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kennedy among the justice...»Reply #32