Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
18. If the Government is serious about Global Warming what are they doing
Thu Apr 10, 2014, 03:08 AM
Apr 2014

allowing new nuclear plants on coastlines? They are only serious about a new tax and exchange scheme to further rip off the useless eaters.


Locations of new reactor cores and nuclear plants

Soon after its passage, The Washington Post critically analyzed the legislation and found that the nuclear industry received serious concessions from the government in the Environmental Policy Act of 2005...

"The bill's biggest winner was probably the nuclear industry, which received billions of dollars in subsidies and tax breaks covering almost every facet of operations. There were subsidies for research into new reactor designs, "fusion energy," small-particle accelerators and reprocessing nuclear waste, which would reverse current U.S. policy. Rep. Ralph Hall (R-Tex.) even inserted a $250,000 provision for research into using radiation to refine oil...The bill also included $2 billion for "risk insurance" in case new nuclear plants run into construction and licensing delays. And nuclear utilities will be eligible for taxpayer-backed loan guarantees of as much as 80 percent the cost of their plants...

...Because of the enormous costs involved, the nuclear industry requested more loan guarantees from the government, totaling $100 billion. In February 2010, President Obama, who ran on a pro-nuclear platform, negotiated with the companies and added $36 billion to the budgeted $18.5 billion, bringing the total of $54.5 billion to the Presidential 2011 Budget for the DOE loans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_energy_policy_of_the_United_States


Using nuclear fission to boil water is one of the most absurd things humans have managed to ever dream up. For Shame.

A Fraction of the nuke dollars invested in Solar/Wind/Hydrogen would actually make huge differences. But Washington DC doesn't want energy independence, they want energy dependence.

More proof that Obama is really an 80's republican, as he states himself.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Three plants explode in the last 35 years"? Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #1
Right RobertEarl Apr 2014 #3
Your argument is kind of like saying "the Titanic sank, therefore we shouldn't build more ships" Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #6
That is false RobertEarl Apr 2014 #8
Are you serious? daveMN Apr 2014 #9
Eh? RobertEarl Apr 2014 #11
Coal and gasoline emissions kill far more every year than nuclear. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #13
We have like 2% total of nuclear sourced energy RobertEarl Apr 2014 #15
75% of energy in France is nuclear; how many meltdowns and evacuations have they had? Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #16
There was a report from France RobertEarl Apr 2014 #17
With the result that Germany is now burning more coal. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #19
Hmmm RobertEarl Apr 2014 #20
Actually, no, it doesn't. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #21
What are your plans for the nuke waste? RobertEarl Apr 2014 #22
There are any number of things that can be done with the waste. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #23
Well, you are wrong, again RobertEarl Apr 2014 #24
"Come up with ways to decrease CO2 by capture and storage" Spider Jerusalem Apr 2014 #25
Yes, I do RobertEarl Apr 2014 #31
The issue lies, I believe, in human reliability and laziness. Gravitycollapse Apr 2014 #4
Yes. This is key Tom Rinaldo Apr 2014 #30
Nuclear power was and continues to be the safest form of mass energy production. Gravitycollapse Apr 2014 #2
Safest? RobertEarl Apr 2014 #5
Nuclear power has the lowest deaths/TWh of any mass energy production scheme. Gravitycollapse Apr 2014 #7
What you don't seem to care about... RobertEarl Apr 2014 #10
I guess you prefer today's Japan Union Scribe Apr 2014 #12
I feel better, yes RobertEarl Apr 2014 #14
Energy policy is way more complex than that. Conservation and load shifting are being used. Kolesar Apr 2014 #27
If the Government is serious about Global Warming what are they doing nationalize the fed Apr 2014 #18
Dangerous matter johnstyle Apr 2014 #26
There are several other melted cores that were quietly taken off line in the USA Kolesar Apr 2014 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author NuclearDem Apr 2014 #29
Eh? RobertEarl Apr 2014 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author NuclearDem Apr 2014 #33
Three exploded RobertEarl Apr 2014 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author NuclearDem Apr 2014 #35
Good decision to delete your posts RobertEarl Apr 2014 #36
Whatever you say, Robert. NuclearDem Apr 2014 #37
You are finally learning, eh? RobertEarl Apr 2014 #38
This is hilarious. NuclearDem Apr 2014 #39
They still haven't said RobertEarl Apr 2014 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nuclear Power Plans for M...»Reply #18