Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: George W. Bush Used Top Google Results for All Paintings; Who Will Sue for Copyright Infringement? [View all]NV Whino
(20,886 posts)27. Then there's this
Infringement of Copyrighted Photographs
Under U.S. Copyright law, you violate the copyright owner's exclusive rights of copying and/or to create a derivative work by creating a work that is a copy of or "substantially similar" to another's. The courts determine whether the two works are substantially similar by comparing them and evaluating whether copyrightable elements have been used in the second work. A court is much more likely to find an infringement if the subject of the photo has been "set up" by the photographer and contains creative and original elements, compared to a photograph of subjects that already exist, such as in nature or a structure such as the Golden Gate Bridge.
I haven't seen all these paintings (nor do I want to), but I would guess some of the photographs fall under the "set up" category (formal portraits) and some do not (photo journalism or capturing a photo during an event).
But it is all moot, because it will never go to court.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
George W. Bush Used Top Google Results for All Paintings; Who Will Sue for Copyright Infringement? [View all]
kpete
Apr 2014
OP
Meh--let him have his painting. He's not a bad artist, really, and it keeps him
TwilightGardener
Apr 2014
#2
I think some are just put-off by the Corp-Media fawning over him. "Isnt he cute". nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#22
Maybe. The media is obviously trying to rehab the Bush name for Jebster, but
TwilightGardener
Apr 2014
#25
Copying from a photograph or image without permission is legal - until you try to sell it.
canoeist52
Apr 2014
#17
Painting a photograph, doesn't that fall under "Fair use" clause of copyright law
bobduca
Apr 2014
#19