Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,175 posts)
14. it wasn't fucking solitaire
Tue Mar 27, 2012, 08:55 PM
Mar 2012

. . . and it wasn't a game where he had every advantage over the outcome. The issue was whether we were going forward with a flawed bill or do absolutely nothing. that's still what most critics and opponents haven't bothered or managed to overcome. Most anyone can come up with a better plan, but, very few plans have enough support to advance into action or law. That's the game -- finding something with enough legislative support which will advance the issue and remedies. Nothing more inept than refusing to compromise and leaving the entire system at the status quo that existed at the time of passage.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I appreciate the expeditiousness. Loudly Mar 2012 #1
I think of it as institutional ineptness. xchrom Mar 2012 #2
Setting aside your CNN, Toobin talking points. Firebrand Gary Mar 2012 #3
The Big O will come out for single payer mdmc Mar 2012 #4
But who would believe him now? DJ13 Mar 2012 #9
Hey if he did, I wouldn't care if he was sincere. kenny blankenship Mar 2012 #23
You're kidding, right? subterranean Mar 2012 #16
yeah mdmc Mar 2012 #21
. snagglepuss Mar 2012 #5
He does seem a bit naive. MrSlayer Mar 2012 #6
There seems to be a lot of opinion that Verrilli had a rough day... PoliticAverse Mar 2012 #7
Verrilli just didn't seem to be prepared for the type of COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #11
Obama didn't strip the severability clause. jeff47 Mar 2012 #28
I understood he was OK with that decision? nt COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #31
It wasn't a decision, it was an oversight. jeff47 Mar 2012 #33
No, the White House is not inept, elleng Mar 2012 #8
Maybe he's not playing every single possible game. Maybe he played it when it happened and is enough Mar 2012 #10
Forget about the politicians izquierdista Mar 2012 #12
I think if Obama really sells his policies he wins. Remember they didn't go all out to sell health applegrove Mar 2012 #13
Obama doesn't even mention deaniac21 Mar 2012 #25
The problem is we have a Supreme Court whose majority has an agenda...... marmar Mar 2012 #32
it wasn't fucking solitaire bigtree Mar 2012 #14
Single payor polled huge and still does Mojorabbit Mar 2012 #29
He Was Dealt a Really Weak Hand AndyTiedye Mar 2012 #15
Jumping to unfounded conclusions isn't helping anyone Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #17
What, in the debauched creation of this horrid legislation, kenny blankenship Mar 2012 #18
I think it will depend on how the American people react. This issue could push the anger at the jwirr Mar 2012 #19
I agree, he could play this for HUGE sympathy and direct all anger at the Pukes kenny blankenship Mar 2012 #22
these points were discussed on thom hartman the other day madrchsod Mar 2012 #27
well, who knows with all the crap in the air. Yet reactionary crap has always been there UTUSN Mar 2012 #20
inept? really ?who have you been reading? madrchsod Mar 2012 #24
chess? GusFring Mar 2012 #26
the outcome is yet to be determined... chill spanone Mar 2012 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did Obama really play thi...»Reply #14