Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton is a "populist leaning liberal" on the issues, [View all]Whisp
(24,096 posts)140. It appears that clinton is in that stellar company of pugs:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/us/welfare-limits-left-poor-adrift-as-recession-hit.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all&
Critics of the stringent system say stories like these vindicate warnings they made in 1996 when President Bill Clinton fulfilled his pledge to end welfare as we know it: the revamped law encourages states to withhold aid, especially when the economy turns bad.
The old program, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, dates from the New Deal; it gave states unlimited matching funds and offered poor families extensive rights, with few requirements and no time limits. The new program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, created time limits and work rules, capped federal spending and allowed states to turn poor families away.
My take on it was the states would push people off and not let them back on, and thats just what they did, said Peter B. Edelman, a law professor at Georgetown University who resigned from the Clinton administration to protest the law. Its been even worse than I thought it would be.
But supporters of the current system often say lower caseloads are evidence of decreased dependency. Many leading Republicans are pushing for similar changes to much larger programs, like Medicaid and food stamps.
Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, the top House Republican on budget issues, calls the current welfare program an unprecedented success. Mitt Romney, who leads the race for the Republican presidential nomination, has said he would place similar restrictions on all these federal programs. One of his rivals, Rick Santorum, calls the welfare law a source of spiritual rejuvenation.
==
when the likes of Ryan, Mitt and the Foamy One agree, it's gotta be great! right? right? RIGHT?
Critics of the stringent system say stories like these vindicate warnings they made in 1996 when President Bill Clinton fulfilled his pledge to end welfare as we know it: the revamped law encourages states to withhold aid, especially when the economy turns bad.
The old program, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, dates from the New Deal; it gave states unlimited matching funds and offered poor families extensive rights, with few requirements and no time limits. The new program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, created time limits and work rules, capped federal spending and allowed states to turn poor families away.
My take on it was the states would push people off and not let them back on, and thats just what they did, said Peter B. Edelman, a law professor at Georgetown University who resigned from the Clinton administration to protest the law. Its been even worse than I thought it would be.
But supporters of the current system often say lower caseloads are evidence of decreased dependency. Many leading Republicans are pushing for similar changes to much larger programs, like Medicaid and food stamps.
Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, the top House Republican on budget issues, calls the current welfare program an unprecedented success. Mitt Romney, who leads the race for the Republican presidential nomination, has said he would place similar restrictions on all these federal programs. One of his rivals, Rick Santorum, calls the welfare law a source of spiritual rejuvenation.
==
when the likes of Ryan, Mitt and the Foamy One agree, it's gotta be great! right? right? RIGHT?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why isn't the same spluttering outrage directed at anyone who suggests Obama leans liberal?
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2014
#30
Yup, that is exactly why Goldman Sachs paid her $400,000 to give two speeches back in November
Victor_c3
Apr 2014
#5
Which is also what I'd expect from the guy who didn't push to hold any of the banks or wall street
Victor_c3
Apr 2014
#57
I wasn't going to call her the "b word"-I hate that term-and this has nothing to do with gender.
Ken Burch
Apr 2014
#146
So what did she really do to put the policies she claims to favor in action?
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#10
If she's a populist leaning liberal, I have six legs and a third eye in my forehead.
Nanjing to Seoul
Apr 2014
#11
It's a little late for an April Fool's joke, but you did make me laugh. Thanks.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Apr 2014
#15
That pretty much sums up what makes me uneasy about her running for president. I will have to vote
jwirr
Apr 2014
#29
I've never heard her speak in favor of Medical Marijuana, as Sec of State she openly
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2014
#66
Rated 100% NARAL, 96% NAACP, 89% HRC, 82% NEA, 60% ACLU, 35% Chamber of Commerce.
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2014
#27
I see "populist" will be the new buzzword for a while, and soon it will be stretched so far to cover
djean111
Apr 2014
#55
Interesting that when I scroll down to 'Hillary Clinton on Corporations'
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Apr 2014
#78
Lol. What you said, so true! What the heck Would Warren and Sanders be if Hillary is pop lean lib?
Whisp
Apr 2014
#84