Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "[T]hose on the left argue that it did not go far enough" [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)7. You agree with this: "He accomplished everything they sent him to do."
Ergo, George W. Bush was the most effective president in American history.
Sadly, that's accurate. People call him a bumbler and a failure, but according to the metrics set by those he represented, he was spectacularly successful: he broke the government, looted the Treasury, and made his rich friends even richer. He accomplished everything they sent him to do.
Sadly, that's accurate. People call him a bumbler and a failure, but according to the metrics set by those he represented, he was spectacularly successful: he broke the government, looted the Treasury, and made his rich friends even richer. He accomplished everything they sent him to do.
It's "accurate" to say Bush was "the most effective president in American history"?
More "effective" than FDR? I mean, FDR gave up on health care reform to save the New Deal.
The previous title actually nailed it, but the silliness is front and center. A President working to change the country for the better is going to encounter the denials, dimissals and mocking.
Bush "broke the government, looted the Treasury, and made his rich friends even richer," and President Obama's critics will say that Bush, not FDR, was the "most effective president in American history."
Still, I changed the title because, as expected, there it is.
LOL!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think the eventual expansions of Social Security not to mention the creation of Medicare
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2014
#8
And so those who say 'it did not go far enough' included FDR himself because it did not
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2014
#11
FDR's reforms proved that there is a better way than pure capitalism. The naysayers are ridiculous.
reformist2
Apr 2014
#18
Where are the calf brains marinated in truffle-soaked baby ducks testicles?
BeyondGeography
Apr 2014
#27
You're sweet. You have to admire such single minded dedication. Keep up the good work.
McCamy Taylor
Apr 2014
#40