Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(97,644 posts)
16. Change takes time.
Sun Apr 13, 2014, 10:35 AM
Apr 2014

And the effects are not always apparent in the beginning. As with Obamacare, it is a leap in the right direction. Not perfect, no but as seen in Vermont it will eventually lead to single payer. It won't happen by itself, we have to keep fighting hard for it to happen.

Vermont health care reform

In 2011, the Vermont state government enacted a law functionally establishing the first state-level single-payer health care system in the United States. Green Mountain Care, established by the passage of H.202, creates a system in the state where Vermonters receive universal health care coverage as well as technological improvements to the existing system.

snip/

The three options were laid out as following:

Option 1: As laid out by the requirements of Act 128, the first option would create "a government-administered and publicly financed single-payer health benefit system decoupled from employment which prohibits insurance coverage for the health services provided by this system and allows for private insurance coverage only of supplemental health services."[4] The proposal considered this option to be the easiest path to single-payer, but was critical of the "complex and inefficient process" of proof of residency needs.

Option 2: As laid out by the requirements of S 88, the second option would create "a public health benefit option administered by state government, which allows individuals to choose between the public option and private insurance coverage and allows for fair and robust competition among public and private plans."[4] The commission noted that this option did not provide universal coverage on its own or the enforcement mechanism in place for any possible mandates put in place to achieve more coverage.

Option 3: Act 128 allowed the commission to design a system that met the various principles outlined in Section 2 of the Act.[1] The commission's design ultimately sought out an "approach to Option 3... by combining three studies to ascertain what type of universal health insurance, what methods of financing, and what type of single payer system is most likely to be politically and practically viable for Vermont."

The commission's proposal ultimately considered the third option to be "the most politically and practically viable single payer system for Vermont," noting that Vermont, "a small state with communitarian values," with its existing network of non-profit hospitals and a medical structure that had shown previous support in state intervention, would be "uniquely poised to pass universal health reform."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermont_health_care_reform

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ergo, George W. Bush was the most effective president in American history. WilliamPitt Apr 2014 #1
Silliness, the critics were only on one side. President Obama ProSense Apr 2014 #3
Ouch. MannyGoldstein Apr 2014 #4
You agree with this: "He accomplished everything they sent him to do." ProSense Apr 2014 #7
G DUHbya wanted to privatize Social Security Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Apr 2014 #23
breaking shit is easy Schema Thing Apr 2014 #5
Not everything, he didn't get Social Security. A Simple Game Apr 2014 #12
Demolishing a house is easier than building one. JoePhilly Apr 2014 #15
By that measure small Bush was a very effective. maced666 Apr 2014 #2
Granting Dodd-Frank as the strongest bill of its kind in 3 generations, TheKentuckian Apr 2014 #6
I think the eventual expansions of Social Security not to mention the creation of Medicare Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #8
If you're saying ProSense Apr 2014 #9
And so those who say 'it did not go far enough' included FDR himself because it did not Bluenorthwest Apr 2014 #11
Absolutely ProSense Apr 2014 #13
It took approxiamtely 10 years to "smooth" out the wrinkles in SSI Iliyah Apr 2014 #19
Yes, and pushing for progress ProSense Apr 2014 #21
"Even a mirror cannot show you yourself, if you refuse to look at it". riqster Apr 2014 #10
I like your quote lavenderdiva Apr 2014 #29
Roger Zelazny riqster Apr 2014 #33
Thanks so much rigster!! lavenderdiva Apr 2014 #38
No worries. He is one of my fave writers. riqster Apr 2014 #39
With 75 Democrats in one of those Senates treestar Apr 2014 #14
Change takes time. sheshe2 Apr 2014 #16
Yes, ProSense Apr 2014 #17
FDR's reforms proved that there is a better way than pure capitalism. The naysayers are ridiculous. reformist2 Apr 2014 #18
Yeah? Well, neither did Hank Aaron OR Babe Ruth - calimary Apr 2014 #20
One would hope that the pages from 'The Politics of Upheaval' cheapdate Apr 2014 #22
Yes, and ProSense Apr 2014 #24
Brick by Brick mckara Apr 2014 #25
The irony is that FDR saved capitalism... Drunken Irishman Apr 2014 #26
Where are the calf brains marinated in truffle-soaked baby ducks testicles? BeyondGeography Apr 2014 #27
Krugman: ProSense Apr 2014 #28
I'm glad that there are some that know and understand history here Number23 Apr 2014 #30
Um.... did I miss something? Isn't this Obama's second term? McCamy Taylor Apr 2014 #31
Um, ProSense Apr 2014 #37
You're sweet. You have to admire such single minded dedication. Keep up the good work. McCamy Taylor Apr 2014 #40
I have a thing for facts. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #41
Incrementalism? BlindTiresias Apr 2014 #32
And until we elect solid, obstruction-proof majorities in the House and Senate, it will continue. riqster Apr 2014 #34
Lol BlindTiresias Apr 2014 #35
I hear ya. In Ohio, it's a sorry lot, with a few exceptions. riqster Apr 2014 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"[T]hose on the left...»Reply #16