General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ending a Potential Armed Dispute without Violence Is NOT Failure [View all]MineralMan
(151,345 posts)There are laws and there are laws. Some laws are designed to protect people from criminal activity. Other laws are administrative in nature and do not involve any threats to people. The BLM grazing permit laws are in the second category. How laws are enforced have to do with the nature of those laws.
The BLM has a legal right to remove cattle from the lands it manages, but the penalties for illegally grazing on such lands involve fines and other penalties. They're not about any danger to people. There is no possible reason to kill people over such laws. So, the BLM doesn't do that.
What the right-wing morons call for is irrelevant. They've been calling for such actions for years and over many things. I'm not impressed with their anger and sense of victory. I am impressed with the BLM's decision to retreat and rethink. It was a good move in the short term. What happens next will be judged next.
Since you have nothing at risk in this particular issue, I find it odd that you're calling for...what? What would you have done, if you were in charge of the BLM's process in this instance? Let's hear your plan of action, shall we?