Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Nevada Standoff Has Nothing To Do With "Tyranny," "Sovereignty," "Freedom," or Cows. [View all]
It's about money for two Billionaires with whom we're all familiar.
Two affiliates of the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity are helping conservative media promote the cause of a Nevada rancher who has made violent threats against the federal government.
...
Legal scholars have largely concluded that these laws are unconstitutional. But with a fanatical, Federalist-society indoctrinated Supreme Court Majority bending over backwards to accommodate corporate interests in every conceivable manner, the Constitution has proved to be a flimsy protection against virulent greed. By milking and stoking the controversy, the Kochs seek to galvanize public opinion against the federal government, delegitimize the Bureau of Land Management that oversees public lands, and thereby impugn its stewardship of lands that Koch-run industries want to get their hands on. These include lands in Nevada, Utah and pretty much anywhere else they can dig, frack or mine. This isn't about some silly rancher's "grazing fees," to the Kochs and their business pals. It's about their desire to exploit, despoil and pollute lands that we, the public, own by virtue of our citizenship. That's not "freedom." It's greed.
In fact, it's almost tragic to see how the "militia groups" that pride themselves on their purported "independence" and "freedom" so willingly allow themselves to be duped by people whose only interest is to exploit the land for their own purposes. Whose self-serving greed wouldn't hesitate to gin up an armed confrontation in which people could conceivably die, simply for the purpose of lining their own pockets.
Did I sound like I feel sorry for the militia groups? I don't. If they were truly patriots I might feel sorry for them, but they aren't. Because true patriots would realize that the federal lands the Kochs, the oil, mining and energy industries are attempting to claim for themselves are:
Two affiliates of the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity are helping conservative media promote the cause of a Nevada rancher who has made violent threats against the federal government.
...
Legal scholars have largely concluded that these laws are unconstitutional. But with a fanatical, Federalist-society indoctrinated Supreme Court Majority bending over backwards to accommodate corporate interests in every conceivable manner, the Constitution has proved to be a flimsy protection against virulent greed. By milking and stoking the controversy, the Kochs seek to galvanize public opinion against the federal government, delegitimize the Bureau of Land Management that oversees public lands, and thereby impugn its stewardship of lands that Koch-run industries want to get their hands on. These include lands in Nevada, Utah and pretty much anywhere else they can dig, frack or mine. This isn't about some silly rancher's "grazing fees," to the Kochs and their business pals. It's about their desire to exploit, despoil and pollute lands that we, the public, own by virtue of our citizenship. That's not "freedom." It's greed.
In fact, it's almost tragic to see how the "militia groups" that pride themselves on their purported "independence" and "freedom" so willingly allow themselves to be duped by people whose only interest is to exploit the land for their own purposes. Whose self-serving greed wouldn't hesitate to gin up an armed confrontation in which people could conceivably die, simply for the purpose of lining their own pockets.
Did I sound like I feel sorry for the militia groups? I don't. If they were truly patriots I might feel sorry for them, but they aren't. Because true patriots would realize that the federal lands the Kochs, the oil, mining and energy industries are attempting to claim for themselves are:
Owned by every American all 300-plus million of us. It is a peculiar property right we each have to this commons, as we acquire it simply by dint of citizenship, and what we own is spectacular. The marvel of the federal public-lands system is that it exists at all. During the 19th century and into the early 20th, much of the land was leased and sold off in a frenzy of corrupt dealings. Railroads, corporations, land speculators, mining interests, and livestock barons gorged on the public domain, helped along by the spectacularly pliable General Land Office, which from 1812 until its closure in 1946 privatized more than one billion acres, roughly half the landmass of the nation. The corruption was such that by 1885, The New York Times editorial page had denounced the land pirates whose fraud and force had excluded the citizen settlerthe farmer, the homesteader, the cowboyfrom enormous areas of public domain and robb[ed] him of the heritage to which he was entitled.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/12/1291577/-The-Nevada-Standoff-Has-Nothing-To-Do-With-Tyranny-Sovereignty-Freedom-or-Cows
© Kos Media, LLC
Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified
"Feds Turn From Landlords To Warlords": Koch Groups Back Rancher Making Violent Threats Against Federal Gov't
In 1993, Bundy declined to pay government fees that are required in order to allow his cattle to graze on the public land. In 1998 a court order told Bundy to remove his cattle as part of an effort to protect an endangered desert tortoise in the area. He refused. In July 2013, a federal court order told Bundy to remove his cattle from the land or they would be confiscated. He disobeyed the order, and confiscation has begun. The government will auction the animals and use the proceeds to pay off the $1 million in fines that Bundy owes the government.
Bundy's ongoing refusal to obey the law and court orders has become a cause célèbre for the conservative media, which has compared the situation to deadly standoffs like Waco and Ruby Ridge.
In recent comments to a conspiracy theorist's radio show, Bundy said, "I haven't called no militia or anything like that, but hey it looks like that's where we're at." He added, "We got a strong army here, we have to fight." Previously Bundy told the Las Vegas Sun that "he keeps firearms at his ranch" and promised to "do whatever it takes" to defend his cattle being seized, adding, "I abide by almost zero federal laws."
...
Americans for Prosperity (AFP), the conservative non-profit group, was founded by and has been largely funded by billionaires Charles and David Koch. The Center for Media and Democracy reported that in its previous incarnation as Citizens for a Sound Economy, AFP received $12 million of its $18 million in funding from the Koch Family Foundation.
Bundy's ongoing refusal to obey the law and court orders has become a cause célèbre for the conservative media, which has compared the situation to deadly standoffs like Waco and Ruby Ridge.
In recent comments to a conspiracy theorist's radio show, Bundy said, "I haven't called no militia or anything like that, but hey it looks like that's where we're at." He added, "We got a strong army here, we have to fight." Previously Bundy told the Las Vegas Sun that "he keeps firearms at his ranch" and promised to "do whatever it takes" to defend his cattle being seized, adding, "I abide by almost zero federal laws."
...
Americans for Prosperity (AFP), the conservative non-profit group, was founded by and has been largely funded by billionaires Charles and David Koch. The Center for Media and Democracy reported that in its previous incarnation as Citizens for a Sound Economy, AFP received $12 million of its $18 million in funding from the Koch Family Foundation.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/04/11/feds-turn-from-landlords-to-warlords-koch-group/198857
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Nevada Standoff Has Nothing To Do With "Tyranny," "Sovereignty," "Freedom," or Cows. [View all]
SunsetDreams
Apr 2014
OP
Interesting article, that and I guess Saint Ronnie must have a chink in his armor or something....
SunsetDreams
Apr 2014
#6
I wonder whether the government could take aerial photos of Bundy's cattle grazing
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#17
Thank you for this article, PS.. I think BLM did the right thing in backing off for now..
Cha
Apr 2014
#94
Very true, it's a knee jerk reaction taught to them by the Koch loving media, not thinking it out.
freshwest
Apr 2014
#9
Progressives, really? I mean really left of center and concerned with Social Justice?
Anansi1171
Apr 2014
#58
If the rancher was black he would be called a good-for-nothing freeloader. Just ask the militias to
kelliekat44
Apr 2014
#76
If the wingnut wants to graze on taxpayers' land, he needs to pay the taxpayers.
SunSeeker
Apr 2014
#11
i have a feeling the government will get its money even if it has to take some of Bundy's
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#20
Unless I misunderstood, that is exactly what BLM was doing - enforcing a court order
tularetom
Apr 2014
#98
The term "Standoff" conjured up a Waco or Ruby Ridge situation going on in real time.
2banon
Apr 2014
#13
The rancher refused to pay the fee for 20 years, is he not just another "welfare queen" ?
peacebird
Apr 2014
#36
These cattle are being sold for a profit, and thousands of other Arizona ranchers pay the
mbperrin
Apr 2014
#104
Yes. If you don't have grazing fees and a system for determining who gets to graze, you
JDPriestly
Apr 2014
#25
+1. Good analogy. Many have lost sight of what is fair and the value of being fair.
Enthusiast
Apr 2014
#64
are you inviting Native Americans to reclaim your property without a fight too?
lunasun
Apr 2014
#73
It might have been stolen but not by us. We bought it from Mexico in the Treaty of Hidalgo for
ancianita
Apr 2014
#40
Check history in general, not "mine." And I didn't say the "whole West," just the land in dispute.
ancianita
Apr 2014
#49
Well, I keep reading it here, and at least care to straighten out the history of our acquiring it.
ancianita
Apr 2014
#97
You do not have a constitutional right to do as you please on federal lands
MattBaggins
Apr 2014
#37
I agree with you. Gov mistake was to let him get away with it so long. Now he feels entitled.
The Wielding Truth
Apr 2014
#92
If you want to travel that far, go for it. Wouldn't be the first time a trespasser's animals were
ancianita
Apr 2014
#51
Agreed! Not only that, it was media's excuse to dismiss Bernie and Harry's facts on the Kochs...
freshwest
May 2014
#115
While the alleged Koch backing of Bundy may need more info to be considered truthful, it does make
okaawhatever
Apr 2014
#84
when the BLM sees they are caught with "constitutional infringement" they make the case MOOT by
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#103
Thank you for this, SunsetDreams.. Very important to get the Facts out there regarding the Kochs
Cha
Apr 2014
#96