Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

SunsetDreams

(8,571 posts)
Sun Apr 13, 2014, 01:35 PM Apr 2014

The Nevada Standoff Has Nothing To Do With "Tyranny," "Sovereignty," "Freedom," or Cows. [View all]

It's about money for two Billionaires with whom we're all familiar.

Two affiliates of the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity are helping conservative media promote the cause of a Nevada rancher who has made violent threats against the federal government.

...

Legal scholars have largely concluded that these laws are unconstitutional. But with a fanatical, Federalist-society indoctrinated Supreme Court Majority bending over backwards to accommodate corporate interests in every conceivable manner, the Constitution has proved to be a flimsy protection against virulent greed. By milking and stoking the controversy, the Kochs seek to galvanize public opinion against the federal government, delegitimize the Bureau of Land Management that oversees public lands, and thereby impugn its stewardship of lands that Koch-run industries want to get their hands on. These include lands in Nevada, Utah and pretty much anywhere else they can dig, frack or mine. This isn't about some silly rancher's "grazing fees," to the Kochs and their business pals. It's about their desire to exploit, despoil and pollute lands that we, the public, own by virtue of our citizenship. That's not "freedom." It's greed.

In fact, it's almost tragic to see how the "militia groups" that pride themselves on their purported "independence" and "freedom" so willingly allow themselves to be duped by people whose only interest is to exploit the land for their own purposes. Whose self-serving greed wouldn't hesitate to gin up an armed confrontation in which people could conceivably die, simply for the purpose of lining their own pockets.

Did I sound like I feel sorry for the militia groups? I don't. If they were truly patriots I might feel sorry for them, but they aren't. Because true patriots would realize that the federal lands the Kochs, the oil, mining and energy industries are attempting to claim for themselves are:

Owned by every American – all 300-plus million of us. It is a peculiar property right we each have to this commons, as we acquire it simply by dint of citizenship, and what we own is spectacular. The marvel of the federal public-lands system is that it exists at all. During the 19th century and into the early 20th, much of the land was leased and sold off in a frenzy of corrupt dealings. Railroads, corporations, land speculators, mining interests, and livestock barons gorged on the public domain, helped along by the spectacularly pliable General Land Office, which from 1812 until its closure in 1946 privatized more than one billion acres, roughly half the landmass of the nation. The corruption was such that by 1885, The New York Times’ editorial page had denounced the “land pirates” whose “fraud and force” had excluded the citizen settler—the farmer, the homesteader, the cowboy—from “enormous areas of public domain” and “robb[ed] him of the heritage to which he was entitled.”


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/04/12/1291577/-The-Nevada-Standoff-Has-Nothing-To-Do-With-Tyranny-Sovereignty-Freedom-or-Cows

© Kos Media, LLC
Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified


"Feds Turn From Landlords To Warlords": Koch Groups Back Rancher Making Violent Threats Against Federal Gov't

In 1993, Bundy declined to pay government fees that are required in order to allow his cattle to graze on the public land. In 1998 a court order told Bundy to remove his cattle as part of an effort to protect an endangered desert tortoise in the area. He refused. In July 2013, a federal court order told Bundy to remove his cattle from the land or they would be confiscated. He disobeyed the order, and confiscation has begun. The government will auction the animals and use the proceeds to pay off the $1 million in fines that Bundy owes the government.

Bundy's ongoing refusal to obey the law and court orders has become a cause célèbre for the conservative media, which has compared the situation to deadly standoffs like Waco and Ruby Ridge.

In recent comments to a conspiracy theorist's radio show, Bundy said, "I haven't called no militia or anything like that, but hey it looks like that's where we're at." He added, "We got a strong army here, we have to fight." Previously Bundy told the Las Vegas Sun that "he keeps firearms at his ranch" and promised to "do whatever it takes" to defend his cattle being seized, adding, "I abide by almost zero federal laws."

...

Americans for Prosperity (AFP), the conservative non-profit group, was founded by and has been largely funded by billionaires Charles and David Koch. The Center for Media and Democracy reported that in its previous incarnation as Citizens for a Sound Economy, AFP received $12 million of its $18 million in funding from the Koch Family Foundation.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/04/11/feds-turn-from-landlords-to-warlords-koch-group/198857
115 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks for posting. Another post ProSense Apr 2014 #1
Thanks going to read it nt SunsetDreams Apr 2014 #2
Interesting article, that and I guess Saint Ronnie must have a chink in his armor or something.... SunsetDreams Apr 2014 #6
Interesting. ProSense Apr 2014 #10
bingo glinda Apr 2014 #106
I wonder whether the government could take aerial photos of Bundy's cattle grazing JDPriestly Apr 2014 #17
Exactly lark Apr 2014 #112
Thank you for this article, PS.. I think BLM did the right thing in backing off for now.. Cha Apr 2014 #94
Repeating: Gunnutters are itching for bloodshed, just a matter of when/where. n/t UTUSN Apr 2014 #3
With billion dollar backing! Seems the Kockroaches want a civil war. Rex Apr 2014 #87
The winds are def. blowing in that direction~ blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #99
I have a couple of Skidmore Apr 2014 #4
Very true, it's a knee jerk reaction taught to them by the Koch loving media, not thinking it out. freshwest Apr 2014 #9
Progressives, really? I mean really left of center and concerned with Social Justice? Anansi1171 Apr 2014 #58
Yep. Skidmore Apr 2014 #68
Good stuff Sunset and Pro! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2014 #5
K&R Hugin Apr 2014 #7
Ranchers want to graze free libodem Apr 2014 #8
If the rancher was black he would be called a good-for-nothing freeloader. Just ask the militias to kelliekat44 Apr 2014 #76
very good point. nt Duppers Apr 2014 #80
Pretty sure you are right libodem Apr 2014 #82
If the wingnut wants to graze on taxpayers' land, he needs to pay the taxpayers. SunSeeker Apr 2014 #11
i have a feeling the government will get its money even if it has to take some of Bundy's JDPriestly Apr 2014 #20
agreed. Duppers Apr 2014 #53
Unless I misunderstood, that is exactly what BLM was doing - enforcing a court order tularetom Apr 2014 #98
Thanks for connecting this. Same station, same time: freshwest Apr 2014 #12
The term "Standoff" conjured up a Waco or Ruby Ridge situation going on in real time. 2banon Apr 2014 #13
So you agree with the federal grazing fees debunkthis Apr 2014 #14
You think cattle should graze for free? Enthusiast Apr 2014 #24
I think of eating as a right debunkthis Apr 2014 #26
The rancher refused to pay the fee for 20 years, is he not just another "welfare queen" ? peacebird Apr 2014 #36
Actually debunkthis Apr 2014 #71
The county does not own the land; the federal govt. does. Duppers Apr 2014 #81
Of course not malaise Apr 2014 #90
that's an inaccurate way to protray what's going on here! Duppers Apr 2014 #41
Perhaps why he does not respond to my post... peacebird Apr 2014 #66
Or perhaps debunkthis Apr 2014 #75
These cattle are being sold for a profit, and thousands of other Arizona ranchers pay the mbperrin Apr 2014 #104
"He's not running a shelter for homeless cows." ctsnowman Apr 2014 #108
"He's not running a shelter for homeless cows." Rhythm Apr 2014 #110
It's my land too. Show me my money. grahamhgreen Apr 2014 #107
Then you've done a good job of contradicting yourself Major Nikon Apr 2014 #109
Yes. If you don't have grazing fees and a system for determining who gets to graze, you JDPriestly Apr 2014 #25
No, the fees won't be a hardship for the ranchers debunkthis Apr 2014 #31
as it is with all businesses Duppers Apr 2014 #47
+1 SunSeeker Apr 2014 #50
"Your perspective is strange for someone posting on DU." Enthusiast Apr 2014 #65
exactly Duppers Apr 2014 #77
Fair enough. JDPriestly Apr 2014 #55
That isn't quite true. The costs of grazing are not necessarily passed on. PDJane Apr 2014 #95
The fee is $1.35 a month per cow-calf pair beginning in 1993. mbperrin Apr 2014 #105
+1. Good analogy. Many have lost sight of what is fair and the value of being fair. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #64
Exactly! Duppers Apr 2014 #79
Yes. n/t Crunchy Frog Apr 2014 #27
The Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 SunsetDreams Apr 2014 #28
Please understand debunkthis Apr 2014 #33
So we should have complete anarchy? MattBaggins Apr 2014 #35
It is a constitutional right to graze animals? A Simple Game Apr 2014 #46
- Takket Apr 2014 #57
are you inviting Native Americans to reclaim your property without a fight too? lunasun Apr 2014 #73
What part of the Constitution Rincewind Apr 2014 #102
Sovereignty = Free Will DeSwiss Apr 2014 #15
Greed, but whose greed? former9thward Apr 2014 #16
You missed the entire point. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #21
And you notice it is ONLY cattle ranchers that get to graze for "free" fasttense Apr 2014 #32
It might have been stolen but not by us. We bought it from Mexico in the Treaty of Hidalgo for ancianita Apr 2014 #40
We bought the whole West from Mexico? former9thward Apr 2014 #43
Police? StarryNite Apr 2014 #45
Please check the poster I was replying to. former9thward Apr 2014 #48
Check history in general, not "mine." And I didn't say the "whole West," just the land in dispute. ancianita Apr 2014 #49
BLM policies affect the entire West... former9thward Apr 2014 #63
Oh spare us. NuclearDem Apr 2014 #69
You are comparing Natives with the Tatars? former9thward Apr 2014 #72
Ah, just so we're clear. NuclearDem Apr 2014 #74
Another non-answer. former9thward Apr 2014 #85
No strawmen at all. NuclearDem Apr 2014 #93
Well, I keep reading it here, and at least care to straighten out the history of our acquiring it. ancianita Apr 2014 #97
"You can't get good title from a thief." Brigid Apr 2014 #83
Yes it is another matter and complicated. former9thward Apr 2014 #86
Yes, that is certainly true. Brigid Apr 2014 #88
Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #18
K&R! These militia types are drowning in ignorance. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #19
I honestly can't understand... NaturalHigh Apr 2014 #22
Funny debunkthis Apr 2014 #23
That is a lie maindawg Apr 2014 #34
You do not have a constitutional right to do as you please on federal lands MattBaggins Apr 2014 #37
I agree with you. Gov mistake was to let him get away with it so long. Now he feels entitled. The Wielding Truth Apr 2014 #92
The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend. nt SunSeeker Apr 2014 #52
What constitutional right is Bundy fighting to protect? JDPriestly Apr 2014 #54
You're a fan of the Oath Keepers? gollygee Apr 2014 #70
So illegal authoritarians trump legal authoritarians in your book. Rex Apr 2014 #89
Which ones were the illegal authoritarians? TampaAnimusVortex Apr 2014 #114
where is OUR CUT??? fuck crapitalism. pansypoo53219 Apr 2014 #29
No federal disaster relief for him... Blue State Bandit Apr 2014 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author closeupready Apr 2014 #38
ok SunsetDreams Apr 2014 #42
okay...so his cows are on public property Horse with no Name Apr 2014 #39
If you want to travel that far, go for it. Wouldn't be the first time a trespasser's animals were ancianita Apr 2014 #51
good point! Duppers Apr 2014 #61
Thank You For Sharing cantbeserious Apr 2014 #44
this is very important G_j Apr 2014 #56
From day one of this Fraud Wellstone ruled Apr 2014 #59
Agreed! Not only that, it was media's excuse to dismiss Bernie and Harry's facts on the Kochs... freshwest May 2014 #115
We can turn our economy rightside-up and crush the Kochs! Anansi1171 Apr 2014 #60
Seems a bit creatively speculative The Straight Story Apr 2014 #62
While the alleged Koch backing of Bundy may need more info to be considered truthful, it does make okaawhatever Apr 2014 #84
Truthful or not The Straight Story Apr 2014 #91
A 'post' on DU and DK are different. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #101
BLM Statement... PoliticAverse Apr 2014 #67
This is happening in my community. WinstonSmith4740 Apr 2014 #78
when the BLM sees they are caught with "constitutional infringement" they make the case MOOT by Sunlei Apr 2014 #103
Thank you for this, SunsetDreams.. Very important to get the Facts out there regarding the Kochs Cha Apr 2014 #96
I have a couple of neighbors who graze their livestock on BLM land. They pay to do so. Autumn Apr 2014 #100
going to read this all in depth later. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2014 #111
Same here Catherine Vincent Apr 2014 #113
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Nevada Standoff Has N...