General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Regardless of what response you favor, BLM did back off in the face of armed intimidation [View all]christx30
(6,241 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 14, 2014, 01:25 PM - Edit history (1)
government has used violence, force, and intimidation to get its way for a long time. Drone strikes, 'enhanced interrogation', stop and frisk, Oscar Grant, Ruby Ridge, ect shows that they have no qualms about using violence against the people.
But this is a case where the people push back, and they 're not sure how to take it.
But about your homeless man trying to survive, if Kelly Thomas is any indication, they'll just beat him to death and be acquitted of any crime. But if it was 200 homeless people, armed with rocks, bottles, other weapons, and willing to fight the cops to get what they want, the police either have to get more backup to enforce the law, or they have to back down. Nothing has changed at all now. You bring enough guns to enforce the law or you say it's not worth it. Not everyone respects every law. Not everyone considers your cow sacred.