Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Never, EVER, give in to Bullies and Terrorists. [View all]
Last edited Mon Apr 14, 2014, 11:41 AM - Edit history (3)
http://bluntandcranky.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/never-ever-give-in-to-bullies-and-terrorists/"Waaaay back in the day, your humble correspondent was bullied at elementary school. The bullying continued and indeed grew more violent as time went on without punitive action from any source. Finally, I had had enough and the bully got the living s*** beat out of him, after which he stopped bullying my nascent blunt and cranky corpus. He did it as long as it was successful, and stopped bullying when it stopped being successful.
Back in the day, Ronnie Reagan negotiated with Iranian terrorists, giving the lie to our oft-stated never negotiate with terrorists policy (you remember the Iran-Contra scandal? That.) and thus encouraged decades of terrorist attacks against the USA: because our weak, two-faced actions did not match our tough rhetoric.
Somewhat later, Russia invaded Georgia, and the Bushistas made all manner of blustering, bellicose threats, none of which they could (or did) back up. So the Neo-Soviets in Moscow went right ahead and stole part of a foreign country, and just recently did it again (Crimea) and is currently doing it yet again as this is being written (Eastern Ukraine). Because the West showed that our big talk was just that: all talk, no walk.
And last weekend, a bunch of mouth-breathing domestic terrorists waved their cheap plastic guns at Federal agents, and the Feds showed their bellies and surrendered. Granted, no one wants bloodshed, but this sets a precedent and sends the same message to these un-American militia scumbuckets that Reagan sent to Iran, and Bush sent to Russia. And the results are all too likely to be similar.
Because you cannot reason with the unreasonable. Because humans tend to do this time what worked last time. So the treasonous bastard terrorists in America will say to themselves, threatening to kill Feds worked so well, lets do it again.
Short-term appeasement of violent extremists might seem reasonable in a given moment: but it always ends badly. The BLM officials who caved to violent terrorists have emboldened these white, Teabagging, anti-America, strong-argument-for-retroactive-abortion yahoos, and you can bet they will take the same lesson that bullies and terrorists always do. Those stupid f***s."
Source info at the link.
On edit: I'm not peeved at the lack of gunfire: I'm pissed that the BLM backtracked and gave back the cattle, etc. Not necessary to avoid bloodshed. http://rt.com/usa/nevada-cattle-rachner-row-268/
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm sure the widows and families of the fallen officers would have fully understood.
Nye Bevan
Apr 2014
#6
Sure. The next time a hostage has a gun pointed at his/her head, just say goodbye.
randome
Apr 2014
#8
The rancher, by allying himself with a domestic terror group, is employing terrorist means.
riqster
Apr 2014
#50
I don't think Mr. Blunt and Cranky has been in that many fights since his grade school days
aikoaiko
Apr 2014
#13
Probably right. And also probably never served in anything like federal law enforcement, either.
randome
Apr 2014
#14
The fact is the author is guilty of the exact same thing it accuses others of being.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#34
9/11 was directed at all Americans but I still suspect our response was an ill-considered one.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#28
Being able to say you were in the right is cold comfort when families are burying their dead
pinboy3niner
Apr 2014
#45
Possibly. But I contend that a defensive action is not equivalent to an offensive one.
riqster
Apr 2014
#49
Remember when Bush was in office and everything the neocons looked at was a terr'ism?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#25
He has already been rewarded. He is getting his cattle back, and will be grazing for free.
riqster
Apr 2014
#46
People here get angry when unarmed people are shot or brutalized by the police
Crunchy Frog
Apr 2014
#84