General Discussion

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)

3. This is stupid turned up to 11. nt

Reply to Johonny (Reply #1)

Mon Apr 14, 2014, 07:49 PM

Apr 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

what if genders were reversed in this situation? [View all] Liberal_in_LA Apr 2014 OP

It's such a fine line between clever and stupid Johonny Apr 2014 #1

This is stupid turned up to 11. nt msanthrope Apr 2014 #3

Either way, most people would take it for some kind of stunt eridani Apr 2014 #2

Couldn't he just be her sub and she is his Dom? Humanist_Activist Apr 2014 #4

Luckily, offending others' sensibilities isn't against the law. 1000words Apr 2014 #5

I know that emotionally my reactions to this and a hypothetical gender-reversed situation... Silent3 Apr 2014 #6

How about ethnic differences? Or what about class differences? Man was wearing overalls Liberal_in_LA Apr 2014 #10

I think I would have been more offered if it were a woman libodem Apr 2014 #7

Diff'rent Strokes, For Diff'rent Folks Warren DeMontague Apr 2014 #8

Possible scenario...he did something direly bad alittlelark Apr 2014 #9

since you are making it into a he vs she thing.... at a guess, i would imagine you would have about seabeyond Apr 2014 #11

Asked and answered, old thread warning! Humanist_Activist Apr 2014 #12

at least that leash person gets to walk upright. Still disturbing though Liberal_in_LA Apr 2014 #15

Why is it disturbing? n/t Humanist_Activist Apr 2014 #16

person on a chain, leash. disturbing. Liberal_in_LA Apr 2014 #18

I don't see how that is disturbing, unless its non-consensual, then there are problems. Humanist_Activist Apr 2014 #19

I find a "child leash" to be the very same public spectacle 1000words Apr 2014 #21

obvious difference. an adult can navigate street and surround. a 2 yr old cannot seabeyond Apr 2014 #22

they think they are so cutting edge, daring. it is foolish, they just look foolish. a game. seabeyond Apr 2014 #20

People are allowed to look foolish, I have friends who go LARPing occasionally... Humanist_Activist Apr 2014 #23

you do understand nowhere did i state that people are not allowed to look foolish, right? seabeyond Apr 2014 #28

Holy nostalgia. PeaceNikki Apr 2014 #38

I remember that thread. newcriminal Apr 2014 #45

Looks like it is an advertising stunt? maddezmom Apr 2014 #13

As long as she cleans up his poop, I don't care. name not needed Apr 2014 #14

i would think it was some PETA type thing JI7 Apr 2014 #17

I have seen this type of thing before. Lady Freedom Returns Apr 2014 #24

No word from the usual suspects. Vashta Nerada Apr 2014 #25

It's ok if what happens to men? cyberswede Apr 2014 #27

usual suspects. why the nasty? seabeyond Apr 2014 #29

Shrug. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #26

They still have horses in London? Warren DeMontague Apr 2014 #32

Don't men pay women to do things like this to them? nt valerief Apr 2014 #30

The point is that would you find it a bigger problem if the genders were reversed? davidn3600 Apr 2014 #33

Probably, because I don't think many women pay men to do such things to them, so valerief Apr 2014 #43

Not to cross any lines or step on toes Arcanetrance Apr 2014 #31

Wouldn't necessarily freak out either way. But the imagery would seem a bit different nomorenomore08 Apr 2014 #34

The Hoff would be all up in arms CFLDem Apr 2014 #35

of course you did, as you and others often do. at least you had the honestly to edit... seabeyond Apr 2014 #37

No Sea CFLDem Apr 2014 #39

you just wanted some of this seabeyond Apr 2014 #40

That's our Sea! CFLDem Apr 2014 #41

Actress reveals she walked man around central London on a lead for theatrical stunt maddezmom Apr 2014 #36

I would take the two situations as completely different. NCTraveler Apr 2014 #42

I just hope she picked up his poop. zappaman Apr 2014 #44

Whatever gets you going.... moriah Apr 2014 #46