Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nine

(1,741 posts)
13. Wrong question. There are many bad guys who deserve harsh punishment.
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 09:15 AM
Apr 2014

Ariel Castro, for example. There are also many people who consider a life sentence to be even harsher than a death sentence. At least one of Castro's victims felt cheated that he took the easy way out by committing suicide. I would never argue against the existence of crimes so heinous that they merit death. In that sense I don't have an absolute moral objection to the death penalty.

But I still think our society is better off without a death penalty. You need only consider how often we see headlines about convicts proven innocent years or decades after their conviction to know that our judicial system is far from flawless. A life sentence instead of a death sentence at least allows for the possibility of correcting these mistakes. It also allows, as mentioned upthread, for the possibility of studying these criminals and maybe learning how to prevent future criminals.

Besides that, my gut instinct is that the death penalty doesn't serve as much more of a deterrent than a life sentence. And eliminating the death sentence spares crime victims (as well as judicial authorities, doctors, state employees, etc.) the moral quandary of having something to do with another person's death as well as the trauma of having to witness it. Why put ourselves through that?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Most appropriate punishme...»Reply #13