General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is Bernie trolling in NH for Koch dollars to finance his presidential bid? [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Most people who had voted for him in 2000 voted for Kerry next time. Kerry's loss had nothing to do with the actions of anyone to Kerry's left.
And we both already know that Bernie wouldn't pull a Nader and run third-party in 2016, so your fears are groundless-and nobody here would back him if he did anyway,
AND we both know(and the OP knows as well)that Bernie would never, NO MATTER WHAT, collude with the Kochs-so there was no reason to even imply that he'd do anything like that.
Bernie is NOT Ralph...can't you just accept that already?
The lesson of 2000, btw, is NOT that progressives are obligated to take whatever the Democratic offers as a presidential ticket(though that would be, agreed, the more prudent choice)-it's that the Democratic Party was WRONG to ever go as far to the Right as it did under Clinton and Gore...the party was wrong to ditch labor, throw the poor under the bus, and tell progressive activists they'd no longer matter. It's up to the party to keep people from feeling that alienated...and there's no one to the right of most Democrats who'd even consider voting Dem anyway, so that strategy was never necessary and didn't gain us any votes(Dukakis took 46%...Clinton took 43% and 49%-NO significant difference in popular vote total).