Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Studies show that most Americans reject facts when [View all]oldhippie
(3,249 posts)112. Really?
But unless you have some other viable hypothesis to explain global warming, you're just another climate change denier in sheep's clothing.
No where do I deny climate change, so I think calling me a climate change denier is untrue and could almost be considered an ad hominem attack. I sincerely believe the climate is changing. To me it's a fact.
I'll even go so far as to say that I think it is probably (i.e. a high probability) anthropogenic, but that hasn't reached the criteria for "fact" by my definition. But I'd be willing to bet money on it.
And I do think there is a need to limit consumption of fossil fuels. And it WILL happen. One way or another.
And no, I don't need some other viable hypothesis to explain global climate change. Not my job. But the Second Law of Thermodynamics also works fine for me.
Oh, and I don't really give a rat's patootie about what is useful to Exxon or the Koch brothers. Skepticism is usually probably (there's that word again) useful to somebody.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
154 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just because someone sides with conservatives on a single issue like nuclear power...
kristopher
Apr 2014
#127
Thank you...It's important to note that the OP's headline is misleading, as
whathehell
Apr 2014
#133
It might be, but the subject line is entirely misleading..It says nothing about "Americans", only
whathehell
Apr 2014
#92
A perfectly reasonable hypothethis, and further studies could be done controlled for nationality.
eShirl
Apr 2014
#20
Further studies could be done controlled for nationality, but as they have NOT been,
whathehell
Apr 2014
#134
No. It really is basic psychology. And it includes everyone. Look Up- Confirmation Bias
KittyWampus
Apr 2014
#40
Your subject line is MISLEADING and you know it..The study says zero about Americans
whathehell
Apr 2014
#136
The thing is, occasionally a study will find an assumption to be incorrect against all common sense.
eShirl
Apr 2014
#52
That's intriguing. If I were to produce a study from elsewhere, would that reinforce your belief?
lumberjack_jeff
Apr 2014
#70
Her "assertions" are the simple facts of how a study is properly done, duh.
whathehell
Apr 2014
#149
Thank you. The study says NOTHING about "Americans" -- It speaks only of a human tendency
whathehell
Apr 2014
#84
Don't know much about research, do you?..Unless the study used 'control' groups of other ethnicities
whathehell
Apr 2014
#67
It is indeed very possible that this is a human trait and not specifically American
gollygee
Apr 2014
#25
We receive too much information and don't have the time to sort it all out.
A Simple Game
Apr 2014
#18
Call Out? LOL! It's a basic human condition. We all do it. It's called "Confirmation Bias".
KittyWampus
Apr 2014
#41
After we rise up and force them to enact campaign finance reform and publicly funded elections
Dustlawyer
Apr 2014
#36
We use the phrase "...but I could be wrong" a lot in my immediate family.
factsarenotfair
Apr 2014
#55
More than others?...You'll have to prove that because this study does not and doesn't even try to
whathehell
Apr 2014
#85
The problem is that most misinformed people rarely pay any consequence at all...
MrScorpio
Apr 2014
#95
See what you want to see. Hear what you want to hear. A trick as old as time itself.
blkmusclmachine
Apr 2014
#106
One of the many reasons why the RW has used polarization as a central strategy since
wiggs
Apr 2014
#108
This piece covers the issue very well: The Science of Why We Don't Believe Science.
HuckleB
Apr 2014
#151