Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bloomberg Plans a $50 Million Challenge to the N.R.A. [View all]JJChambers
(1,115 posts)21. We do require background checks for most gun purchases
Every gun I've ever purchased has been preceded by a background check, except for one. A good friend was hard up for some cash and sold me one from his collection for cheap. I traded it the next day at a local FFL and picked up what I really wanted (a ruger LCR .357, which I carry to this day on my ankle everywhere I go. I keep it loaded with Hornady 38 special critical defense loads). Of course the trade transaction had a background check as well.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yeah, the idea is to use money to fight the intensity and funding gaps that currently exist.
DanTex
Apr 2014
#12
Maybe, but that doesn't mean we can't require background checks for gun purchases.
DanTex
Apr 2014
#8
Thank you for the rational reminder. Of course, guns are here to stay.. that doesn't mean
Cha
Apr 2014
#9
What do you mean "banning"? 90% of Americans will support requiring background checks for them.
DanTex
Apr 2014
#15
I doubt it. Criminals get illegal drugs easily. And they are illegal. Guns are 100% legal!
Logical
Apr 2014
#37
The other people who like guns? Of which, even on this forum, there are many.
JJChambers
Apr 2014
#36
A lot less than you think, particularly those who get all excited about carrying a
Hoyt
Apr 2014
#61
What a strange viewpoint you have. I'll never understand it. It's simply illogical.
JJChambers
Apr 2014
#67
Almost as much as I am bemused by deflective posts containing little more than petulance...
LanternWaste
Apr 2014
#52
Or we could use the money to make sure more minorities are stopped and frisked.
oneofthe99
Apr 2014
#34
Challenge consisting of what? A boxing match with the NRA President? Waste...
cherokeeprogressive
Apr 2014
#25
Bloomberg has a set of laws for him and another set of laws for us little people
Lurks Often
Apr 2014
#60